Free sample
Maquila Demystified — Volume 1
This is the beginning of the book, exactly as in the file you receive when you buy it: from the opening pages through the end of the first chapter.
Maquila Demystified — Volume 1
MAQUILA DEMYSTIFIED
Volume 1

MAQUILA DEMYSTIFIED
The Regime and Its Legal Framework
Volume 1
Before structuring the operation, understand the rules.
Foundations and context of the regime · Legal framework and regulatory transition · Checklists, models, and reference matrices
Devanir Alves Campos
Maquila Demystified: producing in Paraguay, competing in Brazil — the regime, taxes, labor cost and the Tax Reform
Volume 1 — The Regime and Its Legal Framework
by Devanir Alves Campos
ISNI: 0000 0005 3065 9612
© TAG Fields, 2026
All rights reserved.
Documentary research collaboration: Aline Francielle F. Campos
Translation and editorial adaptation by OrbinHUB with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
ISBN: 978-65-82201-11-0
Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP)
(Câmara Brasileira do Livro, SP, Brasil)
Campos, Devanir Alves
Maquila demystified [livro eletrônico] :
the regime and Its legal framework / Devanir
Alves Campos ; [tradução OrbinHUB]. --
Balneário Camboriú, SC : TAG Fields, 2026. --
(Maquila demystified ; 1)
ePub
Título original: Maquila sem mistério.
ISBN 978-65-82201-11-0
1. Brasil - Relações econômicas 2. Exportação
3. Industrialização 4. Isenção tributária
5. Reforma tributária 6. Relações econômicas
internacionais 7. Tributação - Leis e legislação
I. Título II. Série.
26-404914.0 CDD-337
Índices para catálogo sistemático:
1. Relações econômicas internacionais 337
Aline Graziele Benitez - Bibliotecária - CRB-1/3129
Legal Notice
This work is informational and educational in purpose and does not replace legal, accounting, tax or regulatory advice. Although prepared with technical rigor and based on official sources, its application depends on the circumstances of each case and on the legislation in force at the time of the decision.
Readers are advised to validate the information with licensed professionals. The author and the publisher accept no liability for decisions taken without proper analysis of the specific case.
All rights reserved. The reproduction, storage or transmission of this work, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization of the publisher is prohibited, except in the cases permitted by applicable law.
TAG Fields Inteligência Tributária Ltda.
tagfields.net | info@tagfields.net
Social media: @tagfields
1st edition: 2026
METHODOLOGICAL NOTE
Copyright © 2026 TAG Fields Inteligência Tributária Ltda. All rights reserved.
1st edition — September 2026.
Normative basis and sources verified through September 2026, with emphasis, in Paraguay, on Ley 7547/2025 and Decree 5714/2026 and, in Brazil, on EC nº 132/2023 [Constitutional Amendment], LC nº 214/2025 [Complementary Law], Leis [Laws] nº 14.754/2023 and nº 14.596/2023, as well as the updates to IN RFB nº 1.037/2010 [Normative Instruction].
This work is technical, informational and educational in nature. Although it was prepared on the basis of extensive documentary research, giving priority to official sources, its content does not constitute or replace legal, tax, accounting, customs, regulatory or business advice specific to a given operation.
Legislation, regulations and administrative practice are subject to change. For that reason, any business decision must be preceded by verification of the rules in force and applicable to the specific case and, where necessary, by analysis by licensed professionals in the jurisdictions involved.
Throughout the work, priority was given to primary and official sources, including laws, decrees, resolutions, regulations, administrative acts and publications of the competent bodies. Where there are divergent interpretations, no express provision, or questions that depend on the circumstances of the specific case, those limitations are presented transparently, in accordance with the methodological criteria adopted in this work.
Whenever relevant, topics are examined in their legal, tax, customs, operational, financial and strategic dimensions, so that the reader understands not only the content of the applicable rules but also their practical implications for structuring and for business decision-making.
DEDICATION
I dedicate this work, first of all, to God, the source of resilience, wisdom, direction and purpose at every stage of this journey.
To my wife, Aline, and to my children, Augusto (in memoriam), Liz and Theo, for the love, the understanding and the precious support during the journey that gave birth to this blessed book.
To my parents, João (in memoriam) and Santina, and to my siblings, for the perseverance, the values and the unconditional love that shaped the foundations of who I am.
To all Brazilian business owners – persevering heroes who believe that internationalization is a strategic opportunity to build companies that are more competitive, more resilient and better prepared for the future, in which their efforts allow them to look at the business itself rather than at the adversities of the environment.
I also dedicate this work to the professionals who, every day, face the complexity of Latin America's tax, customs and regulatory environments and who seek technical knowledge to make safer decisions, promote economic development and create value for society.
A special dedication to the beloved Paraguayan people and their leaders who, by wise decision, chose to embrace prosperity with a warm welcome to those who dream of building legacies, offering a fair, safe and streamlined environment to foreign entrepreneurs and forming a solid base to further strengthen Paraguay's position as a world reference in competitiveness and economic freedom.
May this work help to reduce barriers, expand opportunities, strengthen the economic integration between Brazil and Paraguay and encourage productive investment, job creation, innovation and business cooperation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was only possible thanks to the work carried out, over decades, by countless public and private institutions, researchers, professionals and agents who contributed to building and deepening knowledge about foreign trade, regional integration, international taxation, economic development and industrial competitiveness.
I extend my appreciation to the authorities, government bodies and other institutions that took part in the evolution and improvement of Paraguay's Maquila Regime, as well as to the entities that make available legislation, statistics, technical standards, studies, data and public information indispensable to research of this nature. The existence and quality of those sources make it possible to turn complex subjects into knowledge that is accessible, verifiable and useful for decision-making.
I also thank the business owners and members of the Cámara de Comercio Paraguay Brasil (CCPB), the Câmara de Comércio França-Brasil (CCFB), C12, Legendários, SAE Brasil, FIEP and ABIMAQ, as well as the countless clients, collaborators, teachers, friends, colleagues, partners and professionals with whom I have had the opportunity to live, learn and work throughout my career. The shared experiences, the challenges faced, the technical discussions and the accumulated lessons contributed significantly to the practical, multidisciplinary view presented in this book.
I extend my gratitude to the professionals and interlocutors who, at different moments, shared knowledge, experience, information, inspirations, questions and perspectives that contributed directly or indirectly to the making of this work. Each conversation, collaboration or experience added important elements to the understanding of the challenges faced by companies that operate, or intend to operate, in international environments.
Among them, I extend special, cordial and warm thanks to: Adolfo D’Ecclesiis • Alain Tissier • Alessandro Meliso Rodrigues • Aline Francielle Fracasso Campos • André Soares • Andreia Pinto • Anísio Romanini • Daniel Bergman • Dario Mechi • Edemilson Pinto Vieira • Eliane Lermen • Felipe Couto • Fernando Gonçalves Neto • Gilberto Schorr Grossl • Helio Samora • Ivo José Charvet • Joaquim Ferraz Martins Filho • John Peter Klein • Jorge Nishimura • José Ricardo Nogueira • Kenneth Stanley Kolpus • Luciano Pinto de Almeida • Luiz Bohatch • Luiz Osório Moraes Panza • Luiz Roberto de Souza • Marcelo Iwersen • Maria do Carmo da Silva • Marta Lorena Achucarro • Michel Rojo de Andrade • Pablo Kubo • Rafael Justus Barreto • Ruy Alves Henriques Filho • Sergio Sartori Junior • Sergio Simonetti • Stefan Sjogren • Stephane Wenceslas Raoul Klein • Thiago Nieweglowski • Vinicius Rossato • Wuil Carlo Manika.
Finally, I thank my family, whose understanding, patience, support and encouragement made it possible to devote the time and energy needed to turn years of study, research and professional experience into a work that hopes to contribute to knowledge, to more conscious business decisions and to stronger economic integration between Brazil and Paraguay.
To everyone who, in some way, contributed to this journey and to the making of this book, I record my sincere thanks.
FOREWORD
I have known Devanir Campos and worked alongside him for many years at the France-Brazil Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Paraná (CCIFB-PR), an entity of which we are both members and active participants. Over that period, I have followed his work in a number of discussions, especially in the tax, accounting and business fields.
It was in that context that I had the opportunity to get to know the extensive research he has carried out on investment and the formation of companies in Paraguay. According to a recent survey, in 2026, more than 232 Brazilian companies are operating in Paraguay, among them: Lupo, Karsten, JBS, Riachuelo, Estrela, Vale. What struck me most was the depth, the seriousness and the breadth of his analysis, precisely at a moment when Brazilian entrepreneurs' interest in the neighboring country is growing, whether to expand their businesses, open branches or set up new operations.
Allow me a brief account of my professional background.
I have been a lawyer since 1989 and have worked for French companies since 1987. On a voluntary basis, I serve as director and board member of the France-Brazil Chamber of Commerce and Industry for the Southern region, an entity I also had the honor of presiding over for four terms.
Since 2003, I have been Legal Director of Renault Group for Brazil. Between 2020 and 2025, I also held responsibility for the legal departments of Renault Group in Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. Since April 2026, I have also been in charge of Compliance in Brazil.
Before that, I worked in the financial market between 1987 and 2002, a period in which I experienced at close range some of the most significant national and international economic crises of recent decades.
That experience allowed me to understand how investment decisions are strongly influenced by economic cycles, institutional stability, legal certainty and regulatory predictability. Brazil, owing to its structural characteristics, frequently lives with high interest rates and a high sensitivity to the movements of the global economy. In an increasingly integrated world, crises that arise in one country quickly affect companies, governments and investors in various regions of the planet.
Over recent decades, we have witnessed successive events that brought about profound changes in international capital flows. In many cases, investors withdrew funds from certain markets to redirect them to environments regarded as safer, more stable or more profitable, significantly altering the competitiveness of economies.
Among others, I cite the following crises:
INTERNATIONAL: 1987 | Black Monday: the Dow Jones index in New York plunged 22.6% and dragged down stock exchanges worldwide, 1990 | Bursting of the Japanese Bubble: Speculation in Japan's real estate and stock markets caused the so-called "lost decade", characterized by economic stagnation and chronic deflation, 1997 | Asian Tigers Crisis: Starting in Thailand, it spread through Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia and the Philippines. It caused massive capital flight, brutal devaluations and a deep recession in the region, 2001 | Argentine Economic Crisis (Tango Effect): the corralito caused the largest sovereign default in the country's history, 2008 | Subprime Crisis and Great Recession: The biggest global crisis since 1929. Originating in the US real estate market through the unbridled granting of toxic mortgages (subprime), it culminated in the historic bankruptcy of the bank Lehman Brothers. Global credit froze, generating a structural worldwide recession, 2020 | Covid-19 Pandemic Crisis: A simultaneous supply and demand shock caused by global lockdowns. It caused an abrupt global recession, sharp falls in stock exchanges around the world and required massive liquidity injections by Central Banks.
NATIONAL: 1987-1993 | Hyperinflation and Moratorium: The final aftershock of the "lost decade". Brazil declared a provisional moratorium on its foreign debt in 1987 for lack of reserves. The period was marked by galloping inflation (which reached almost 2,000% a year) and successive failed economic plans, including the confiscation of savings under the Collor Plan in 1990, 1999 | Exchange-Rate Crisis (End of the Green-and-Yellow Anchor): After strong speculative attacks stemming from the Asian and Russian crises, the Brazilian government was unable to sustain the fixed exchange rate/currency band regime established by the Real Plan. The country adopted a floating exchange rate, resulting in a strong and sudden devaluation of the real against the dollar., 2001 | Blackout Crisis: A severe energy crisis stemming from a lack of rain and a lack of investment in transmission infrastructure forced the government to impose compulsory electricity rationing, stalling the growth of industrial GDP that year, 2002 | Crisis of Confidence (Electoral Transition): The imminence of the presidential election generated strong distrust in the international market about the continuity of national economic policy. The "Brazil Risk" soared and the dollar hit historic nominal records at the time, stabilizing only after letters of commitment to fiscal responsibility, 2014-2016 | Brazilian Economic Recession: One of the deepest domestic crises in national history. A combination of a severe fiscal imbalance, a fall in international commodity prices and severe political instability (which culminated in the 2016 impeachment). GDP shrank by about 7% over the 2015-2016 biennium., 2018 | Truckers' Strike: An 11-day nationwide stoppage that left the country short of supplies, affected global production chains and had a strong, immediate negative impact on GDP in the second quarter of that year.
During that period, Brazil faced countless economic challenges, among them high inflation, exchange-rate instability, fiscal crises and frequent regulatory changes. Doing business in the country has never been a simple task.
It is precisely in that scenario that Paraguay began to attract the attention of Brazilian entrepreneurs. Strategically located near the South, Southeast and Center-West regions, the country has for several years offered an environment characterized by greater macroeconomic stability, simpler and more predictable rules, as well as competitive tax and customs regimes.
It is not surprising, therefore, that a growing number of Brazilian companies are establishing operations in Paraguay, especially through the Maquila regime, which offers attractive conditions for export-oriented production.
More than a passing trend, this is a consistent business movement, adopted by companies from various sectors seeking to enhance competitiveness, operational efficiency and access to new markets.
It is exactly in that context that the work developed by Devanir Campos takes on enormous relevance.
His research gathers, organizes and translates a great quantity of information that would normally be scattered across legislation, regulations, studies and practical experience. The result is a work that goes far beyond a book. It is a true reference guide for entrepreneurs, investors, executives, lawyers, accountants, consultants and all those involved in the creation, expansion or internationalization of businesses.
Rarely have I come across material that combines, in such a balanced way, technical depth, objectivity and practical usefulness.
For that reason, I am convinced that this work has the potential to become an indispensable reference for anyone wishing to understand the opportunities, the challenges and the paths to investing in Paraguay with security and strategic vision.
Finally, I want to stress that seeing opportunities in Paraguay does not mean betting on difficulties for Brazil. Quite the opposite. I believe in the potential of the Brazilian economy and in its capacity for growth.
However, in an increasingly competitive and globalized business environment, knowing the alternatives and broadening strategic horizons is a necessity. In that sense, Paraguay can represent an important tool for strengthening Brazilian companies, increasing their competitiveness and driving their development.
And it is precisely for contributing so concretely to that reflection that this work deserves to be read, studied and always kept within reach of those who make business decisions.
Joaquim Ferraz Martins Filho
Legal Director of Renault Group for Brazil, also responsible for Compliance in Brazil.
Director and Board Member of the France-Brazil Chamber of Commerce and Industry for the Southern region, which he presided over for four terms.
PRESENTATION
Few subjects attract as much interest among Brazilian business owners as the possibility of producing with greater tax, logistical and operational efficiency, expanding competitiveness in international markets.
In recent years, Paraguay's Maquila Regime has come to occupy a prominent place in the expansion strategies of companies in many sectors. However, as interest in the subject grows, so do misconceptions, oversimplifications and promises that do not always find support in the legislation or in operational reality.
The maquila is not a tax-evasion mechanism. Nor is it a universal solution capable of benefiting any company. It is a structured legal, tax and customs regime, based on specific rules, its own operational requirements and permanent control mechanisms by the Paraguayan authorities.
At the same time, the transformation of the world economy — driven by the digitalization of business, the expansion of services exports, the reorganization of global supply chains and the changes introduced by the Brazilian Tax Reform — creates a new scenario for companies seeking greater international competitiveness.
This book was born from that convergence of factors.
Maquila Demystified does not seek to defend or criticize the regime. Its purpose is to present, in a technical, objective way grounded in official sources, the legislation, the facts, the risks, the opportunities, the limitations and the good practices related to the Maquila Regime.
Throughout this work, the reader will find a multidisciplinary approach that integrates law, taxation, foreign trade, business strategy, finance, logistics, governance, compliance and management, always guided by one essential question:
How can one make safe business decisions in an increasingly complex regulatory environment?
I hope this work helps to broaden the understanding of the Maquila Regime and serves as a support tool for conscious, responsible and well-founded decisions. Enjoy the reading!
HOW TO USE THIS BOOK
Although organized in sequential chapters, this book was conceived as a manual for permanent reference. Each chapter can be read independently, according to the reader's needs.
Business owners will find a strategic view for evaluating investments; lawyers can deepen the normative analysis; accountants will have an integrated view of the tax impacts; executives will understand the operational and governance aspects; and consultants can use the comparative tables, decision flows and checklists as support tools for internationalization projects.
Throughout the work, several resources were built in to make the practical application of the knowledge easier, among them comparative tables, technical tables, case studies, checklists, flowcharts, executive alerts, frequently asked questions, good practices, main risks and strategic recommendations.
Whenever relevant, topics are examined from three complementary perspectives: Brazil, Paraguay and the international context. Several chapters also incorporate the effects of the Brazilian Tax Reform, allowing the reader to assess how legislative changes may influence present and future business decisions.
The three-volume series. This work is published in three volumes: Volume 1 — The Regime and Its Legal Framework (Chapters 1 to 12, with 4-A, and the Entrepreneur's Toolkit); Volume 2 — Operating in Paraguay (Chapters 13 to 38, with Appendices I to IV, next to Chapter 25); Volume 3 — Economic and Tax Implications in Brazil (Chapters 39 to 45-G, with Appendices D and E). The numbering of chapters, sections, examples, figures and tables is that of the complete work and does not change from one volume to another; a cross-reference to a chapter not in the volume in hand is located through Appendix A, present in all three volumes. The sources (Appendix B), the glossaries, the list of acronyms and the index of each volume cover its own content; the complete glossaries are in Volume 3.
Conventions used in this collection
The statements in this work rest, whenever possible, on verified primary sources, such as official legal texts, government publications and documents issued by the competent bodies, indicated in the body of the text and in the footnotes.
The provenance of each statement is made explicit in the text itself. When a conclusion follows from a reasoned interpretation rather than from an express normative provision, that is indicated. Likewise, when a given piece of information still depends on official confirmation or on the circumstances of the specific case, the work identifies the point to be confirmed and, whenever possible, the competent body or the licensed professional responsible for that validation.
The points where verification is indispensable are consolidated in the Consolidated Table of Local-Validation Alerts, located in the References section and organized under three categories:
CONFIRMED — the statement is supported by a verified primary source, such as an official legal text, a government publication, a document of the competent body or another primary source whose validity has been checked.
PROBABLE — the conclusion follows from a reasoned interpretation of the normative text, of legal scholarship, of documented administrative practice or of convergent institutional sources, with no express provision capable of settling the question entirely.
REQUIRES LOCAL VALIDATION — the rule does not expressly settle a given point — such as a procedure, deadline, amount, requirement or interpretation — or its application depends on the concrete circumstances of the operation. In those cases, the answer must be confirmed with the competent body, in Paraguay or in Brazil, depending on the subject, or submitted to the analysis of a licensed professional.
The highest-risk points falling under this last category are indexed in the Consolidated Table of Local-Validation Alerts. In the body of the work, however, the caveat appears in the wording itself, indicating what must be verified, why and, where applicable, with whom. No specific visual markings are used in the running text to identify those situations.
This category must not be confused with a verification gap. There is a verification gap when the rule or the competent source contains the answer, but the corresponding data or document could not be accessed or confirmed during the preparation of this edition. In those cases, the work itself reports the limitation and, where relevant, the verification attempts made. It is a pending editorial verification, not an obligation transferred to the reader.
General verification rule. No statement in this work dispenses with checking the legislation in force and the concrete circumstances on the date of the decision. The wording itself seeks to indicate the nature and provenance of each statement, while the Consolidated Table of Local-Validation Alerts identifies the points where confirmation with a competent body or licensed professional is indispensable.
Validation tools. Module 24 of the Entrepreneur's Toolkit consolidates, by project phase, the topics that must be examined with the respective advisors before a decision is made. The Consolidated Table of Local-Validation Alerts, in turn, gathers the highest-risk points whose confirmation is indispensable. These tools complement the caveats inserted directly in the body of the text.
Section suffixes. Sections identified by suffixes, such as 5.4.1-B, deal with developments of the same topic and are a normal part of the numbering. The numbering adopted and the respective internal cross-references remain valid.
Sources. The references used are indicated in the body of the text and in the footnotes, and consolidated in the appendices and in the References section. As a general rule, the normative basis of this edition reflects the legislation in force through September 2026. The methodological conventions and the reliability criteria adopted are presented in this section and detailed in the Methodological Note.
Business owners interested in implementing maquila operations are advised to read the whole work before starting any project, since several concepts presented in the opening chapters are the basis for understanding the analyses, risks and decisions dealt with in later sections.
IF YOU ARE NOT BRAZILIAN, READ IT THIS WAY
This book was written from Brazil, with Brazilian business owners, accountants and lawyers as its original audience. The editions in other languages reproduce the same work, with no cuts or additions specific to other jurisdictions. This section therefore exists so that the reader from any country knows, before starting to read, which contents can be used directly, which reflect specifically the Brazilian reality, and which questions need to be examined in light of the legislation of their own jurisdiction.
What applies regardless of the investor's country of origin. The structure of the Maquila Regime is governed by Paraguayan legislation. Ley 7547/2025 and Decree 5714/2026 (Chapters 8 and 9), the maquila program (Chapter 19), the contract (Chapter 20), the submaquila (Chapter 21), the customs procedures — temporary import, export, re-export, guarantees and inspection (Chapters 26 to 32) —, the Mercosur rules of origin (§27.5), the Single Tax (Chapter 33), the Paraguayan VAT — IVA, Impuesto al Valor Agregado (Chapter 34), the IRE (Chapter 35), the IDU (Chapter 36), the INR (Chapter 37), Pillar 2 (§38.6 and §§38.12 to 38.14) and Paraguay's treaty network (§38.2) are part of the Paraguayan legal framework and therefore do not depend on the investor's nationality. The same principle applies to the Paraguayan corporate structure (Chapters 13 and 14), to hiring staff and the IPS (Chapters 41 and 45-A), to foreign exchange and remittances (Chapter 45-E) and to the implementation roadmap presented in the Toolkit.
What is specifically Brazilian. The tax treatment of the partner, investor or controlling company in its home jurisdiction varies with the legislation of each country. In this work, Brazil is the case analyzed in depth, especially in Chapter 39 and its developments (39-A, 39-B and 39-C), in the structures examined in Chapter 15, in the reporting of assets held abroad dealt with in §45-E.6 and in the general regimes compared in Appendix E (§E.2).
On those points, Brazil works as a case for applying the method, not as the geographical limit of the work. Brazilian legislation is examined because it is the home jurisdiction adopted as the reference and because it makes it possible to show, with numbers, legal provisions, assumptions and failure modes, how the analysis must be structured. Conclusions based on Brazilian legislation must not be automatically applied to tax residents of other countries; they do serve, however, as a model for identifying the questions that need answering in each reader's jurisdiction.
The five questions for your own jurisdiction. They are essentially the same questions that Chapter 39 examines for Brazil. The reader from another country should take them to their local advisors. The references to Brazilian legislation indicated below work as an example of method, not as an answer applicable to other jurisdictions.
(i) Is there a controlled foreign company (CFC) regime capable of reaching the profit of the Paraguayan entity before it is distributed? In Brazil, there are specific rules on the subject, examined in §39.1 — for individuals, under Lei nº 14.754/2023, and for legal entities, under Lei nº 12.973/2014 —, as well as in §§15.4 and 38.5. If the reader's jurisdiction has no CFC rules, the taxation of the income may follow a different logic; if it does, their effects must be recalculated under local legislation.
(ii) Is there a double tax treaty between your country and Paraguay — and is it in force? Brazil has no treaty of that kind in force with Paraguay (§38.1). Paraguay's network of international treaties is examined in §38.2, country by country. The existence of a treaty can significantly change the treatment of dividends, interest, royalties and certain services. In the absence of a treaty, the domestic rules of each of the jurisdictions involved must be examined, a situation addressed in §38.8.
(iii) How does your jurisdiction tax dividends or profits received from abroad, and which taxes paid in Paraguay can be used as a credit? In the Brazilian case, the taxation of the results of controlled companies abroad and the credit mechanisms follow their own rules, examined in §39.1 and, as to the creditability of the Single Tax, in §38.8. The Paraguayan IDU and INR are examined in Chapters 36 and 37. Those taxes belong to the analysis of Paraguayan legislation; the treatment given to them by the investor's jurisdiction of residence must be determined under the legislation of that country.
(iv) Are there transfer pricing rules applicable to transactions with related parties in Paraguay? Chapter 40 examines the two dimensions in the Brazil–Paraguay case: Paraguayan legislation and Brazilian legislation, including the effects of the new Brazilian transfer pricing regime (§40.13). The analysis corresponding to Paraguay is part of the local legislation applicable to the operation; the other end must be examined under the rules of the country of origin, including methods, documentation, ancillary obligations and deadlines.
(v) Is there an obligation to report shareholdings, assets or investments held abroad — and what are its thresholds and conditions? In Brazil, certain positions abroad are subject to the Capitais Brasileiros no Exterior (Brazilian Capital Abroad) report to the Central Bank, subject to the applicable thresholds, criteria and frequency (§45-E.6), in addition to the obligations related to taxation and to the income tax return examined in Chapter 15. In other jurisdictions, the existence of the obligation, its thresholds, frequency, form of reporting and the consequences of any non-compliance must be checked.
The essential warning. The answers provided by Brazilian legislation cannot be automatically transported to another jurisdiction. Rates, deadlines, thresholds, obligations and consequences described specifically for Brazil apply only when the respective assumptions of Brazilian legislation are present. This work does not seek to ascertain, estimate or presume the domestic legislation of all other home jurisdictions.
What can be transported is the method of analysis: separating what belongs to Paraguayan legislation from what belongs to the investor's home jurisdiction; answering the five questions before making any calculation; demanding a provision, a validity date and a source for each conclusion; and identifying, in each alternative, its conditions of application, limitations and failure modes.
With that distinction, the reader from any country can use directly the analysis of the Paraguayan legal framework presented in this work and take the Brazilian case as a methodological reference for identifying the questions that must be examined in light of the legislation of their own jurisdiction.
Reference table — Brazilian institutions and terms and their rough U.S. parallel. Each term receives, at its first appearance in this book, a short explanation in brackets; this table gathers those explanations together with the limits of each comparison. The parallels are functional approximations verified at official Brazilian and U.S. sources (consulted October 15, 2026), never legal identity: they do not transplant one country’s rules onto the other. Where no equivalent exists, the table says so.
| Brazilian term | What it is in Brazil | Rough U.S. parallel | Limits of the comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBS | Brazilian subnational value-added tax on goods and services, shared by states and municipalities, created by the 2023 consumption-tax reform. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; there is no VAT at any level, and state and local general sales taxes are single-stage retail taxes, not credit-invoice taxes. |
| CBS | Brazilian federal value-added tax on goods and services, created by the 2023 consumption-tax reform to replace PIS and Cofins. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; the federal government levies no general consumption tax, only selective excise taxes on specific goods and activities. |
| CFC | Brazilian rules taxing a resident owner on profits of foreign controlled companies: Law 12.973/2014 for corporations, Law 14.754/2023 for individuals. | Subpart F and net CFC tested income (formerly GILTI) rules, IRC §§ 951 and 951A, for U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations | The U.S. rules apply to corporate and individual U.S. shareholders alike with income-category tests, ownership thresholds and rates that differ from the Brazilian unconditional corporate inclusion and the 15% individual regime. |
| LC 214/2025 | Brazilian complementary law that institutes the IBS, the CBS and the Selective Tax, detailing the consumption-tax reform. | Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 of the United States Code, as the federal statute instituting and regulating federal taxes | The analogy is only one of legal rank (statute instituting taxes); the Internal Revenue Code contains no VAT and covers only federal taxes, while LC 214 also governs a subnational tax. |
| EC 132/2023 | Brazilian constitutional amendment that reformed consumption taxation, authorizing the IBS, the CBS and the Selective Tax. | Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as the constitutional amendment that authorized a federal tax | The parallel is only formal (a tax authorized by constitutional amendment); the Sixteenth Amendment concerns income tax, not consumption taxes, and the U.S. has had no consumption-tax reform of this kind. |
| ICMS | Brazilian state-level tax on the circulation of goods and on interstate and intermunicipal transport and communication services. | State and local general sales and use taxes, levied by individual states and localities | U.S. sales taxes are single-stage retail taxes with no credit mechanism, no federal framework law, rates set by each state, and some states levy none; the ICMS is a multi-stage credit tax. |
| CSLL | Brazilian federal social contribution levied on corporate net profit, alongside corporate income tax, to finance social security. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; corporate profit is taxed only by the federal corporate income tax (IRC § 11, 21%), with no separate earmarked profit-based contribution. |
| Receita Federal | Brazilian federal agency that administers internal taxes and customs, auditing, collecting and ruling on federal taxes and foreign trade. | Function split: Internal Revenue Service (federal tax administration) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (customs and trade enforcement) | In the U.S. tax and customs are two agencies under different departments (Treasury and Homeland Security), and neither administers state taxes. |
| IRPJ | Brazilian federal corporate income tax, 15% plus a 10% surcharge on profit above a monthly threshold, computed under real, presumed or arbitrated profit. | Federal corporate income tax, IRC § 11, at a flat 21% on taxable income, reported on Form 1120 | Rates and base differ (21% flat versus 15% + 10%), the U.S. has no presumed-profit option, and most U.S. states add their own corporate income tax. |
| Imposto Seletivo | Brazilian federal excise created by the tax reform on goods and services harmful to health or the environment. | Federal excise taxes on specific goods, services and activities (IRC Subtitles D and E), administered by the IRS and, for alcohol and tobacco, the TTB | U.S. excises are a long-standing patchwork of product-specific taxes with no unified 'harmful goods' rationale; lists, rates and bases do not match the Selective Tax. |
| PIS/Cofins | Brazilian federal social contributions computed on a company's gross revenue, to be replaced by the CBS under the tax reform. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; the federal government levies no tax on gross revenue, and the few gross-receipts taxes that exist are state-level and unrelated to social security. |
| ISS | Brazilian municipal tax on services of any nature, levied by municipalities and the Federal District under a federal complementary law. | State and local general sales taxes, to the extent a state or locality chooses to tax services | Most U.S. sales taxes reach goods and only selected services, are not a dedicated municipal services tax, and have no national list of taxable services. |
| IN RFB | Sub-statutory regulation issued by the Receita Federal, a complementary norm of tax law under art. 100 of the National Tax Code. | Treasury Regulations and IRS Revenue Procedures, the administrative guidance issued under the Internal Revenue Code | Treasury Regulations are issued jointly by Treasury and the IRS after notice-and-comment rulemaking and carry different deference rules; a Revenue Procedure is closer in rank but narrower in scope. |
| IPI | Brazilian federal tax on manufactured products, domestic or imported, with rates set per product in a tariff-style table. | Federal manufacturers excise taxes, IRC Subtitle D, Chapter 32 | U.S. manufacturers excises reach only a short list of goods (automotive items, coal, vaccines, recreational equipment), whereas the IPI is a broad tax across the whole product table. |
| IRPF | Brazilian federal personal income tax with progressive monthly brackets up to 27.5%, plus a reduction mechanism for lower incomes. | Federal individual income tax, IRC § 1, with progressive brackets up to 37%, filed on Form 1040 | Brackets, rates, filing status, deductions and the annual-versus-monthly computation differ, and most U.S. states also tax personal income. |
| IRRF | Brazilian income tax withheld at source by the payer on salaries, services and payments abroad, reported to the Receita Federal. | Function split: wage withholding under IRC § 3402 and withholding on U.S.-source payments to foreign persons under IRC §§ 1441–1443 (NRA withholding, generally 30%) | The U.S. does not withhold on most domestic business-to-business service payments, and its 30% cross-border rate, treaty reductions and definitions differ from the Brazilian tables. |
| CIDE | Brazilian federal contribution of 10% on payments abroad for technology licensing, technical services and related know-how. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; payments abroad for royalties or services are reached only by income-tax withholding (IRC §§ 1441–1442), not by a separate economic-intervention levy. |
| BCB | Brazilian central bank, which issues currency, conducts monetary policy, controls credit and supervises financial institutions. | Federal Reserve System, the central bank of the United States | Bank supervision in the U.S. is shared with the OCC, FDIC and state regulators, and the Fed neither administers foreign-exchange rules nor receives declarations of residents' assets abroad. |
| CBE | Mandatory declaration to the Central Bank of assets held abroad by Brazilian residents above US$ 1 million (annual) or US$ 100 million (quarterly). | Function split: FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) for foreign financial accounts over US$ 10,000, and Treasury International Capital (TIC) statistical reports | The FBAR covers only financial accounts, has a far lower threshold and is an anti-money-laundering filing, while TIC reporting is statistical; neither is a central-bank asset census. |
| Drawback | Brazilian special customs regime suspending, exempting or refunding taxes on imported inputs used in exported products. | Duty drawback administered by CBP under 19 U.S.C. § 1313, refunding duties, taxes and fees on imported goods that are exported or destroyed | U.S. drawback is essentially a refund after export (up to 99%), without the suspension modality that dominates Brazilian practice, and does not cover state taxes. |
| IOF | Brazilian federal tax on credit, foreign-exchange, insurance and securities transactions, with rates set by decree. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; there is no federal tax on credit, FX or securities transactions, and the only comparable levy is the narrow excise on premiums paid to foreign insurers (IRC § 4371). |
| RECOF | Brazilian special customs regime letting a company import or buy inputs with federal taxes suspended, under computerized control, for industrialization and export. | Foreign-Trade Zones, where merchandise may be stored, manipulated or manufactured without being subject to customs laws until entered (19 U.S.C. § 81c) | An FTZ is a physical designated area supervised by CBP and suspends only customs duties, whereas RECOF is a company-based authorization that also suspends internal federal taxes. |
| Lucro Real | Brazilian corporate income tax regime in which IRPJ and CSLL are computed on actual book profit adjusted by tax additions and exclusions. | Regular computation of corporate taxable income under IRC § 11, reported on Form 1120 | In the U.S. actual taxable income is the only method for all corporations, so 'Lucro Real' is not an elective regime there; adjustments, loss rules and rates differ. |
| CARF | Brazilian federal administrative tax court, a joint body of government and taxpayer representatives, hearing appeals against first-instance tax rulings. | Function split: IRS Independent Office of Appeals (administrative) and the United States Tax Court (judicial pre-payment forum under IRC § 6213) | Appeals is an internal IRS office, not a paritary tribunal, and the Tax Court is a court whose decisions bind both sides; CARF decisions bind only the administration. |
| ZFM | Brazilian free-trade area in the Amazon with special federal tax incentives to build an industrial, commercial and agricultural hub. | Foreign-Trade Zones program (19 U.S.C. §§ 81a–81u), administered by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board and supervised by CBP | FTZs only defer, reduce or eliminate customs duties; they carry none of the income-tax, IPI or ICMS incentives of Manaus and are not a regional development policy. |
| CNPJ | Brazilian national registry number identifying companies and other entities before the Receita Federal for tax and legal purposes. | Employer Identification Number (EIN), the federal tax identification number of a business entity issued by the IRS | An EIN is purely a federal tax identifier; it is not a public registry of corporate data, and company formation and registration are state matters. |
| FGTS | Brazilian employer-funded severance fund: 8% of each worker's monthly pay deposited into an individual account the worker draws on dismissal and other events. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; federal and state unemployment-insurance payroll taxes fund pooled benefits, not individual worker accounts, and there is no statutory severance deposit. |
| INSS | Brazilian social-security contributions: employer pays 20% on payroll and employees pay progressive rates, financing public pensions and benefits. | Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes (FICA): 6.2% + 6.2% Social Security up to a wage base and 1.45% + 1.45% Medicare | Rates, wage caps and benefit design differ (12.4% + 2.9% combined, capped Social Security), and the U.S. has no separate social-security agency collecting the contributions; the IRS does. |
| Siscomex | Brazilian integrated foreign-trade system that registers, monitors and controls import and export operations for customs, trade and exchange authorities. | Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), CBP's single window through which trade reports imports and exports and agencies decide admissibility | ACE is run by CBP alone and does not integrate foreign-exchange control, which in the U.S. does not exist; module names, licensing and data fields do not correspond. |
| Simples Nacional | Brazilian unified simplified tax regime that lets micro and small companies pay several federal, state and municipal taxes in one monthly payment. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; small businesses use pass-through forms (sole proprietorship, S corporation) within the ordinary income tax, with no unified multi-tax payment. |
| DCTF/ECF | Brazilian federal ancillary filings: the DCTF declares federal tax debits and credits; the ECF is the digital accounting-tax bookkeeping supporting IRPJ/CSLL computation. | Function split: Form 941 (quarterly employment-tax return) and Form 1120 (corporate income tax return with book-tax reconciliation) | U.S. returns both declare and compute the tax; there is no separate debt-confession declaration nor a full digital bookkeeping file transmitted to the IRS. |
| STF/STJ | Brazil's two top courts: the STF guards the Constitution and may issue binding precedents; the STJ unifies interpretation of federal law. | Supreme Court of the United States, the highest court, created by Article III of the Constitution | The U.S. has one top court for both constitutional and federal-law questions, with discretionary review, and state supreme courts are final on state law. |
| IRPFM | Brazilian minimum personal income tax under Law 15.270/2025: up to 10% on annual income above R$ 600,000, crediting tax already paid. | Alternative Minimum Tax for individuals, IRC § 55, ensuring high-income taxpayers pay at least a minimum amount of tax | The AMT recomputes taxable income with disallowed preferences at 26%/28%, rather than applying a flat floor to total income including dividends; thresholds and mechanics differ. |
| CLT | Brazilian consolidated labor code governing individual and collective employment relations, including the statutory definition of employee. | Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.), setting minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping and youth-employment standards | The U.S. has no comprehensive labor code; the FLSA covers only pay and hours, employment is largely at-will, and many protections are state law or absent. |
| Súmula | Short numbered statement summarizing a Brazilian court's settled case law; STF súmulas vinculantes bind other courts and public administration. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; precedent binds through the decisions themselves (stare decisis), and courts issue no separate numbered summaries with autonomous binding force. |
| Lucro Presumido | Brazilian optional corporate regime computing IRPJ/CSLL on a presumed profit margin (e.g., 8% or 32%) of gross revenue, for companies below a revenue ceiling. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; corporations always compute tax on actual taxable income, and no presumed-margin election exists. |
| CPF | Brazilian individual taxpayer registry number, managed by the Receita Federal and used as the citizen's identifier for tax and public services. | Function split: Social Security Number (SSN, issued by the SSA) and Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN, issued by the IRS) | The SSN is a social-security number that doubles as tax ID, while the ITIN is tax-only for people ineligible for an SSN; neither is a universal civil identifier like the CPF. |
| Lei do Bem | Brazilian Law 11.196/2005 granting automatic tax incentives for research and technological innovation to companies taxed under Lucro Real. | Federal research credit, IRC § 41 (credit for increasing research activities), claimed on Form 6765 | The U.S. incentive is an incremental tax credit on qualified research expenses, not a super-deduction, and carries no IPI or depreciation components; eligibility rules differ. |
| INPI | Brazilian federal agency granting patents and registering trademarks, industrial designs, software and technology-transfer contracts. | United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the Commerce Department agency granting patents and registering trademarks | The USPTO does not register software (copyright, handled by the Copyright Office) nor record technology-transfer contracts for tax or FX purposes. |
| Radar/Habilitação | Mandatory Receita Federal enrollment (Siscomex habilitação) a company needs to import or export, with modalities tied to its financial capacity. | Importer identity record with CBP (CBP Form 5106), required before filing the first formal import entry | CBP registration is a simple identity record with no financial-capacity tiers or value limits; U.S. risk control works through customs bonds, not through enrollment modalities. |
| eSocial | Brazilian unified digital system through which employers report labor, social-security and tax obligations in one submission. | Function split: wage reporting to the Social Security Administration (Forms W-2) and employment-tax returns to the IRS (Form 941) | There is no single federal window; employers file separately with SSA, IRS and state agencies, and event-based reporting of hires and terminations is largely a state matter. |
| COSIT | Receita Federal's general tax coordination that answers formal taxpayer consultations; its rulings bind the agency and protect taxpayers in the same situation. | Function split: IRS Private Letter Rulings (binding only for the requesting taxpayer) and Revenue Rulings (published general interpretations) | A PLR may not be relied on by other taxpayers, unlike a Solução de Consulta Cosit, and Revenue Rulings are issued by the IRS at its own initiative, not in response to consultations. |
| pró-labore | Pay received by a Brazilian partner or director for work in the company, taxed as employment-type income and subject to social-security contribution, unlike dividends. | Reasonable compensation paid as wages to shareholder-employees of S corporations before non-wage distributions | The U.S. concept exists to police employment taxes in pass-through entities; C-corporation dividends are taxable, and partners receive guaranteed payments (IRC § 707(c)), so the wage/dividend split has different stakes. |
| carnê-leão | Monthly personal income tax a Brazilian resident must pay on income received from other individuals or from abroad, when not withheld at source. | Estimated tax payments (Form 1040-ES) on income not covered by withholding | U.S. estimated tax is quarterly, not monthly, and applies to any under-withheld income (self-employment, interest, dividends), not specifically to income from individuals or abroad. |
| pejotização | Brazilian practice of hiring a worker through a one-person company to disguise an employment relationship and avoid labor rights; its limits are under STF review. | Worker misclassification: treating an employee as an independent contractor, assessed by the IRS common-law test and the DOL under the FLSA | U.S. misclassification turns on control tests applied agency by agency and does not hinge on the worker holding a company; consequences are employment taxes and FLSA pay, not the full Brazilian labor package. |
| MEI | Brazilian simplified regime for sole proprietors with revenue up to R$ 81,000 a year and at most one employee, paying fixed monthly amounts. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; a sole proprietor simply reports on Schedule C and pays self-employment tax, with no fixed monthly payment, revenue cap or special status. |
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
List of the acronyms and abbreviations most used in this work, with the official name in the original language and, where useful, the translation or explanation in English.
ACE — Acordo de Complementação Econômica (Economic Complementation Agreement, ALADI/Mercosur)
ANDE — Administración Nacional de Electricidad (Paraguay)
BACN — Biblioteca y Archivo Central del Congreso Nacional (Library and Central Archive of the National Congress, Paraguay)
BCB — Banco Central do Brasil (Central Bank of Brazil)
BCP — Banco Central del Paraguay (Central Bank of Paraguay)
BPO — Business Process Outsourcing
CBE — Capitais Brasileiros no Exterior (Brazilian Capital Abroad, Banco Central do Brasil)
CBS — Contribuição sobre Bens e Serviços (Contribution on Goods and Services, Brazil)
CDT / DTT — convention or treaty for the avoidance of double taxation; DTT: Double Tax Treaty
CFC — Controlled Foreign Company (rules for taxing the profits of controlled companies abroad)
CIDE — Contribuição de Intervenção no Domínio Econômico (Contribution for Intervention in the Economic Domain, Brazil)
CNIME — Consejo Nacional de las Industrias Maquiladoras de Exportación (National Council of Export Maquiladora Industries)
COFINS — Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social (Contribution for the Financing of Social Security, Brazil)
DGRP — Dirección General de los Registros Públicos (Directorate-General of Public Registries, Paraguay; functions brought together in the RUN by Ley 7.424/2025)
DNIT — Dirección Nacional de Ingresos Tributarios (Paraguay)
EAS — Empresa por Acciones Simplificadas (Simplified Stock Company, Paraguay)
IBS — Imposto sobre Bens e Serviços (Tax on Goods and Services, Brazil)
ICMS — Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços (Tax on the Circulation of Goods and Services, Brazil)
IDU — Impuesto a los Dividendos y a las Utilidades (Paraguay)
IFRS / NIIF — International Financial Reporting Standards / Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera (Spanish)
IMMEX — Industria Manufacturera, Maquiladora y de Servicios de Exportación (Mexico)
INR — Impuesto a la Renta de No Residentes (Paraguay)
INTN — Instituto Nacional de Tecnología, Normalización y Metrología (Paraguay)
IPC — Consumer Price Index; in the Paraguayan context, the BCP's Índice de Precios al Consumidor
IPCA — Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo (Broad National Consumer Price Index, IBGE, Brazil)
IPI — Imposto sobre Produtos Industrializados (Tax on Industrialized Products, Brazil)
IPS — Instituto de Previsión Social (Paraguay)
IRAE — Impuesto a las Rentas de las Actividades Económicas (Uruguay)
IRE — Impuesto a la Renta Empresarial (Paraguay)
IRRF — Imposto de Renda Retido na Fonte (Withholding Income Tax, Brazil)
IS — Imposto Seletivo (Selective Tax, Brazil)
ISS — Imposto sobre Serviços de Qualquer Natureza (Tax on Services of Any Kind, Brazil)
IVA — Impuesto al Valor Agregado (Paraguay)
M1 — designation of a monetary aggregate; see the Glossary in Appendix C
M2 — designation of a monetary aggregate; see the Glossary in Appendix C
MEF — Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas (Paraguay)
Mercosur — Southern Common Market
MIC — Ministerio de Industria y Comercio (Paraguay)
MTESS — Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social (Paraguay)
NCM — Nomenclatura Comum do Mercosul (Mercosur Common Nomenclature)
OECD — Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PIS — Programa de Integração Social (Social Integration Program, Brazil)
RECOF — Regime Aduaneiro de Entreposto Industrial sob Controle Informatizado (customs regime of industrial warehousing under computerized control, Brazil)
RUC — Registro Único de Contribuyentes (Paraguay)
RUN — Registro Unificado Nacional (Paraguay; Ley 7.424/2025 — brought together the functions of the former DGRP)
SA — Sociedad Anónima (corporation, Paraguay)
SaaS — Software as a Service (software as a service)
SE-CNIME — Executive Secretariat of CNIME
Selic — Sistema Especial de Liquidação e de Custódia (Special System for Settlement and Custody, Brazil); the system is to be distinguished from the Selic rate
SET — Subsecretaría de Estado de Tributación (Paraguay; functions integrated into DNIT)
SIMEX — Sistema Integrado de Maquila para la Exportación (Paraguay) — name used by the MIC; Art. 11 of Decree 5714/2026 calls it "Sistema Informático de Maquila"
SINAFOCAL — Sistema Nacional de Formación y Capacitación Laboral (Paraguay)
SNPP — Servicio Nacional de Promoción Profesional (Paraguay)
SRL — Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada (limited liability company, Paraguay)
STP — Secretaría Técnica de Planificación (Paraguay)
TEC — Common External Tariff (Tarifa Externa Comum, Mercosur)
VAN — Valor Agregado Nacional (national value added — one of the two possible bases of the maquila Single Tax; the greater of VAN and the invoice applies; Paraguay; see Chapter 33)
VUE — Ventanilla Única del Exportador (Paraguay)
INTRODUCTION
We are living through one of the deepest transformations of the world economy since the consolidation of globalization. Companies of all sizes now compete in markets beyond their national borders, production chains have become more distributed and interdependent, services are provided and exported digitally, and tax decisions have ceased to be mere accounting matters and have taken a central role in the strategy, competitiveness and sustainability of businesses.
In this new environment, producing, providing services, hiring, investing and organizing international operations requires an integrated view. Comparing rates or apparent costs is not enough. It is necessary to understand logistics, legislation, taxation, corporate structure, labor relations, customs controls, transfer pricing, governance, technology, regulatory risks and operational capacity. Internationalization is no longer an alternative restricted to large corporations; it has become part of the planning of mid-sized companies and even of specialized businesses seeking efficiency, scale and access to new markets.
In this context, Paraguay has consolidated the Maquila Regime as one of the most relevant instruments for attracting investment, industrializing and promoting exports in South America. Over the last decades, companies in many sectors have used this model to join international production chains, add value locally, expand exports, reduce operating costs and increase their competitiveness.
Proximity to Brazil, the integration provided by Mercosur, the availability of energy, the strategic location, access to the Atlantic Ocean through the Paraguay–Paraná Waterway and the evolution of the institutional environment have all increased business interest in the country. However, those factors alone do not guarantee the viability of a project. Each operation needs to be evaluated according to its structure, its sector, its markets, its contracts, its logistics and its long-term objectives.
At the same time, the modernization of Paraguayan legislation and the implementation of the Brazilian Tax Reform open a new stage for business owners who want to structure international operations in a safe, efficient and sustainable way. Changes in the rules on consumption taxation, on the export of goods and services and on the organization of relations between companies of the same group make it indispensable to have an analysis that simultaneously considers the legal, tax and operational effects in both countries.
Understanding the maquila, therefore, takes much more than knowing a law or repeating that the regime is subject to differentiated taxation. It is necessary to understand its economic logic, its objectives, its limits, the substance requirements, the international contract, the program approved by the Paraguayan authorities, the control mechanisms, the obligations of the maquiladora company, the tax impacts in Brazil and in Paraguay and the risks arising from structures conceived without proper planning.
It is also necessary to distinguish a legitimate business operation from superficial models based solely on the pursuit of tax reduction. The maquila must not be treated as an automatic formula or as a universal solution. It is an instrument of productive integration and internationalization that can produce relevant results when there is real economic activity, planning, governance, control, compliance and consistency between what was approved and what is actually carried out.
It was to fill that gap that Maquila Demystified was born. This work was conceived to turn a subject often presented in a fragmented way into a complete, integrated, decision-oriented guide. Its purpose is not to convince the reader to set up an operation in Paraguay, but to offer knowledge, criteria and tools so that the reader can evaluate that possibility with rigor, independence and strategic vision.
In the following chapters, the reader will go through the historical evolution of the regime, its normative basis, the tax incentives, the administrative procedures, the institutional structure, the industrial maquila, maquila services, digital exports, customs controls, governance, compliance, corporate and contractual relations, the impacts of the Brazilian Tax Reform, the most common risks and the best practices for implementing internationalization projects.
The work also connects legal, tax, economic and operational aspects that are often analyzed separately, even though they are part of the same business decision. More than explaining rules, this book seeks to offer a strategic view capable of relating legislation, business, regional integration and international competitiveness.
By the end of the reading, the aim is for business owners, executives, lawyers, accountants, consultants and other professionals to be better prepared to distinguish real opportunities from simplified promises, ask the right questions, identify risks, evaluate alternatives and make well-founded decisions.
If the reader completes this journey with greater confidence, a critical spirit and a long-term view for evaluating international projects, Maquila Demystified will have fully accomplished its mission.
PART I — FUNDAMENTALS (Chapters 1–5)
Before any spreadsheet, projection or investment decision, the business owner needs to answer an essential question: what is the maquila, in fact — and why has Paraguay become such a relevant environment for this model? This first part lays that foundation.
Chapter 1 presents the regime and its forms of operation; Chapter 2 reconstructs its evolution over almost three decades; Chapter 3 explains the institutions that administer it — CNIME, MIC, DNIT, BCP and the other bodies involved — and how they work together; Chapter 4 examines the factors that sustain Paraguayan competitiveness, such as energy, taxation, labor, geography and logistics, while Chapter 4-A shows where the human capital needed for the different operating profiles is to be found; finally, Chapter 5 confronts the main myths surrounding the maquila, both the unfounded enthusiasm and the fears built on mistaken premises.
By the end of this part, the reader will have a clear view of the structure of the regime, of its economic logic, of the institutions that sustain it and of the reasons that explain its relevance. From that point on, the following parts move on to the legal basis, corporate structuring and the operation itself.
CHAPTER 1 — WHAT MAQUILA IS
1.1 Fundamental Concepts
What the regime is
The maquila regime is a legal system for producing goods and providing services in which a company established in Paraguay, called the maquiladora, carries out, for the account and on the order of a company domiciled abroad, called the parent (matriz), industrial processes or service activities intended for the international market.
The expression for the account and on the order carries the essence of the regime and deserves a slow reading. The maquiladora does not buy inputs to resell a finished product: it provides a transformation service on goods that belong to the parent, and is paid for that. The one who sells to the final customer is the parent; the one who produces is the maquiladora. Almost every legal and tax consequence dealt with in this work follows from that separation — including the fact that the proceeds of the sale do not pass through Paraguay, and what is taxed there is the transformation operation, not the profit of the business.
The two modalities
In the industrial maquila, the Paraguayan company adds labor, facilities, know-how and other national resources to the transformation, processing, repair or assembly of goods. Foreign inputs enter under temporary admission, with import taxes suspended, and the resulting product is exported; inputs of national origin can also be part of the process, and it is precisely the sum of those resources incorporated in the country that forms the national value added.
In maquila services, the maquiladora performs activities such as software development, engineering, customer service, data processing and BPO. The criterion that defines the classification is economic use abroad: the service is produced in Paraguay and consumed outside it. A service provided to a Paraguayan customer, or whose result materializes in the country, is not a maquila services operation — it is a domestic service, subject to the general regime.
What sets it apart
Three features separate the maquila from arrangements that resemble it:
The remuneration is for the operation, not for the sale. The maquiladora receives from the parent an amount for the process performed — the maquila fee —, defined in the contract. There is no commercial margin on the product, because there is no sale by the maquiladora.
Taxation falls on that operation. The 1% Single Tax (Tributo Único) is levied on the national value added or on the value of the export invoice, whichever is greater, and replaces the national taxes on the income from that operation. The base is not the profit — a consequence the reader needs to have clear from the outset, and which the tax chapters develop.
The goods and the market belong to the parent. The maquiladora neither owns the goods produced nor has access to the final customer. It is a regime of productive integration: Paraguay offers production capacity; the parent offers market, technology and inputs.
What the regime requires
The operation must be covered by a Maquila Contract and by a Maquila Program approved by the Paraguayan authorities, and is subject to permanent tax, customs, labor and operational controls. It is therefore neither simple international outsourcing nor merely a tax benefit: it is a regime of productive integration and export, aimed at attracting investment, creating jobs, adding value in Paraguay and inserting the country into international chains of goods and services.1
Ley 7547/2025 broadened the original scope of Ley 1064/97 by formally including Maquila Services (export of intangibles), allowing the export of services such as software development, BPO and technology.2
The regime distinguishes two forms of operation:
Pure Maquiladora: set up specifically to carry out export Maquila Programs — devoted essentially to exports (domestic sale is an express legal exception: up to 10% of the volume exported in the previous year, upon notice to the Executive Secretariat and nationalization — Art. 18).
Idle-Capacity Maquiladora: a company already established and geared to the Paraguayan domestic market that uses its idle capacity for maquila
1.2 Legal Basis
The legal basis of the regime has two layers, and confusing them is the origin of a good part of planning mistakes. The first is the specific basis: the rules that create the regime and define who may operate under it and on what conditions. The second is the general basis: the Paraguayan tax and customs rules that the maquila law does not repeat but invokes — and which remain in force in everything the special regime does not set aside. Whoever reads only the first layer believes the Single Tax ends the tax conversation; whoever reads both understands why the maquiladora still withholds, still files and still keeps documents.
Specific basis — the rules that create and govern the regime
| Legal act | Subject | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ley 1064/97 | "De la Industria Maquiladora de Exportación" (On the Export Maquiladora Industry, explanatory translation) — original law of the regime | Passed 13/May/1997, promulgated 03/Jul/1997. Succeeded by Ley 7547/2025, whose Art. 42 repealed those of its provisions that conflict with the new law. It applied in full to the programs approved under it until September 9, 2026; since September 10, 2026 those programs are incorporated into the new regime by operation of law. For the holder of an old program, it continues to govern what was born while it was in force (Chapter 11, §11.7). |
| Decree 9585/2000 | Regulations of Ley 1064/97 | Published 17/Jul/2000; repealed by Decree 5714/2026, with the same transition caveat as the line above (Chapter 11). |
| Ley 7547/2025 | "Del Régimen de Maquila" — current law | Promulgated 08/Sept/2025; in force. Article-by-article map in §1.3. |
| Decree 5714/2026 | Regulations of Ley 7547/2025 | Signed 06/Apr/2026; in force. Article-by-article analysis in Chapter 9. |
| Resolución SE-CNIME 14/2026 | "Que aprueba la Guía para la presentación de solicitudes de aprobación de Programa de Maquila en el marco de la Ley N.º 7547/2025" — documentary requirements (Annexes I and II) | Issued on 10/Apr/2026; in force — official MIC PDF checked on August 11, 2026. Operational content in §1.3 and §45-G.3. |
General basis — what the maquila law invokes
| Legal act | What it reaches in the maquila |
|---|---|
| Ley 125/91 — Nuevo Régimen Tributario | General tax regime, applicable in everything the special regime does not set aside. It fixes the five-year limitation period, counted from 1 January of the year following the one in which the obligation was due (Art. 164), interrupted by the acts of Art. 165 and suspended under Art. 166 — the document-retention period derives from it (Chapter 44). |
| Ley 2421/2004 — Reordenamiento Administrativo y de Adecuación Fiscal | Historical seat of the greater-of rule, which Ley 7547/2025 reproduces in Art. 37: the base of the Single Tax is the national value added or the value of the export invoice, whichever is greater (Chapter 33). It also sets the threshold for the external tax audit (auditoría externa impositiva) of Art. 33 (Module 8). |
| Ley 6380/2019 — Modernización y Simplificación del Sistema Tributario Nacional | VAT and refund of the credit to the exporter, including of services (Art. 101) — Chapter 34; INR on payments to non-residents — Chapter 37; and the presumption of related parties in transactions with maquiladoras (Art. 37, penultimate paragraph), which pulls the regime into the transfer pricing rules — Chapter 40. |
| Ley 2422/2004 — Código Aduanero | Customs regime of temporary import and re-export (Chapters 26 to 29); guarantees, including the general rule on interest (Arts. 293 and 296) — Chapter 30; and the arrival declaration, defined as the cargo manifest (manifiesto de carga) or its equivalent (Art. 79) — Chapter 29. |
| Ley 7143/2023 | Creates the DNIT, which merged the internal tax administration and the customs administration into a single authority. It is to the DNIT that the regime's reporting obligations and binding rulings are addressed (§26.6.1 and Chapter 9). |
The two regimes coexisted for twelve months, and that coexistence has ended. A program approved under Ley 1064/97 was governed by it until September 9, 2026 and, since September 10, 2026, is incorporated into Ley 7547/2025 by operation of law, with no additional administrative act and no interruption of rights; a program approved under the new law was always born in it. The first question of any analysis is still, for that reason, under which of the two the program was approved — the answer still changes guarantees, running deadlines and the law applicable to the past, even now that the normative basis of the present is a single one. The development — calendar, addressees, accounting adaptation and the ten practical answers — is Chapter 11; here the legal basis only states the window and its outcome. On the validity of this window, see §11.7.
Note on sources. The recitals of Decree No. 5.714/2026 contain two material inconsistencies of reference: they attribute to Ley nº 6.956/2022 the creation of the Dirección Nacional de Ingresos Tributarios (DNIT), although that institution was created by Ley nº 7.143/2023; and they record 30 September 1996 as the date of promulgation of Ley nº 1.064, contrary to the official text, which records the approval of the bill by the Senate on 20 December 1996 and its passage by the Chamber of Deputies on 13 May 1997. These inconsistencies are in the recitals and do not alter the operative text of the Decree; on their own, they do not show the act to be invalid.3 4 5 6 7
1.3 Structuring Articles of Ley 7547/2025
Key articles of Ley 7547/2025:
| Article | Content |
|---|---|
| Art. 1 | Object: definition of the maquila regime (goods and services for export). |
| Art. 2 | Purpose: competitiveness, employment, exports, technology, international integration. |
| Art. 3 | Definitions: maquiladora, parent, submaquila, maquila services, shelter, virtual operations, etc. |
| Art. 6 | Composition of CNIME. |
| Art. 7 | Functions of CNIME. |
| Art. 8 | Approval of programs by MIC + MEF Bi-Ministerial Resolution. |
| Art. 9 | Functions of the Executive Secretariat. |
| Art. 14 | Permanence periods for inputs under temporary import (Art. 14 of Ley 7547/2025: 12 months from import, extendable for an equal period by bi-ministerial resolution — official text read in the PDF of the law published by MIC, August 10, 2026). |
| Art. 17 | Obligations of maquiladoras. |
| Art. 18 | Sales in the domestic market (cap of 10% of the exported volume). |
| Art. 25 | Submaquila. |
| Art. 26 | Idle-capacity maquiladora. |
| Art. 27 | Maquila shelter/albergue. |
| Art. 37 | 1% Single Tax on the national value added or the invoice value, whichever is greater. |
| Art. 39 | Recovery of VAT credit linked to exports, including services. |
| Art. 42 | Transitional provisions and adaptation of old programs. |
In addition to the articles above, Decree 5714/2026 governs the following operational matters:
Treatment of waste and mermas
Maquila import and export procedures
Virtual operations between maquiladoras
Penalty regime
12-month window of coexistence of existing programs with the old law — once expired, incorporation into the new regime is by operation of law, with no additional administrative act and no interruption of rights (Art. 42 of the Law; Art. 54 of the Decree; §11.7)8
MIC9
Complementary rules in force:
Resolución SE-CNIME 53/2023: documentary requirements for program approval
Resolución SE-CNIME 54/2023: procedure for certification of the technical coefficients of consumption (INTN)
Resolución SE-CNIME 14/2026: VUE/SIMEX digital platform and documentary requirements — identification and status in the specific-basis table (§1.2); operational content in §45-G.310
1.4 Regulations and program approval procedures
Decree 5714/2026, signed by President Santiago Peña on 06 April 2026, regulates Ley 7547/2025 and establishes:
Digital application procedure through the VUE/SIMEX platform (Ventanilla Única del Exportador / Sistema Integrado de Maquila para la Exportación)
Electronic Current Account system for controlling the inventory of inputs
Technical criteria for production formulas (in coordination with INTN)
Treatment of waste and mermas
Maquila import and export procedures
Virtual operations between maquiladoras
Penalty regime11
1.5 Program Approval Procedures
Procedure — The approval of a Maquila Program follows a sequence of administrative and technical steps, conducted mainly by the Executive Secretariat of CNIME, by the Council itself and, at the end, by MIC and MEF.
Step 1 — User registration in the VUE
The first step is registering the user on the VUE platform, submitting the documents required to identify the company and its representatives, among them:
RUC or identification document;
deed of incorporation;
documentation on the company's management or board.
Step 2 — Submission of the Maquila Program in SIMEX
The program is submitted electronically in SIMEX and must contain the information needed to understand the proposed operation, including:
program modality — goods, services, submaquila or shelter;
form of operation — pure maquiladora or idle capacity;
detailed description of the industrial process or the service;
location of the operation, with the required geographical information;
BOM (Bill of Materials) or technical consumption spreadsheet, where applicable.
Step 3 — Technical assessment by the Executive Secretariat of CNIME
The Executive Secretariat verifies compliance with the program's formal and technical requirements and may request clarifications, inquiries or additional documents before forwarding it to the Council for deliberation.
Step 4 — Deliberation by CNIME
Once the file is complete, the program is submitted to CNIME for technical analysis and deliberation. The minimum quorum is three of the five members, with mandatory participation of MIC and MEF.
Step 5 — MIC + MEF Bi-Ministerial Resolution
After CNIME's deliberation, MIC and MEF formalize the decision through a Bi-Ministerial Resolution.
The resolution is the formal act of approval of the program, which is then recorded in the corresponding system.
Step 6 — Certifications and complementary registrations
Depending on the nature of the operation, additional procedures may be necessary, among them:
certification of the technical coefficients by INTN, in industrial operations;
registration in the RIEL, where applicable;
other technical or administrative registrations required to start the activity.
Step 7 — Start of operations
Once the approval steps and the applicable complementary registrations are completed, the company can move on to the procedures needed to actually start the operation, including those related to the DNIT and to the regime's customs and tax controls.12
1.6 Checklist of Documentation
For registering the company:
Identity card of the partner/representative (certified)
Tax card / RUC
Deed of incorporation (with the DGPEJ and Beneficial Owners certificate from MEF)
RUC certificate (constancia)
Minutes appointing the board (notified to the Abogacía del Tesoro)
For program approval:
Maquila contract (with notarized signature) or Letter of Intent
Special power of attorney from the parent to the local representative
Criminal-record certificates of the representatives
Approved environmental impact assessment
Incorporation documents of the parent company (apostilled + sworn translation)
Tax compliance certificate
Certificate of not being in insolvency proceedings/bankruptcy
Title deed / lease agreement of the property
Certificate of no legal incapacity (interdicción)13
1.7 Recent overview of the Maquila Regime
The most recent available data show the growing economic and industrial relevance of the Maquila Regime in Paraguay, as well as its strong concentration in the regions most integrated with the country's production and logistics corridors.
In February 2026, 91% of maquiladoras were concentrated in Alto Paraná, Central, Capital and Amambay, showing the importance of those regions for setting up and expanding operations linked to the regime.
The data for January and February 2025 also make it possible to observe the composition of exports and employment. In the first two months of that year, exports under the regime reached USD 197 million, up 23% on the same period of 2024. The sector directly employed 32,232 workers, 26% more than in February 2024.
The export mix showed relevant industrial diversification. Auto parts accounted for 30% of exports, followed by aluminum (18%), apparel and textiles (17%), food (10%) and plastics (10%).
Mercosur remained the main destination, absorbing 77% of exports, led by Brazil (64%) and Argentina (12%). Other relevant markets included the Netherlands, the United States, Spain and Bolivia, each with a share close to 3% in the period considered.
Among the segments historically present in the regime, the following stand out:
auto parts, including electrical cables, wiring harnesses and other components;
apparel and textile products;
aluminum and metalworking;
plastics and packaging;
processed food.
These data show that the Paraguayan maquila is no longer associated only with traditional industrial activities and now houses a more diversified production structure, integrated mainly with the regional market.14
1.8 Case Law
As of the closing of this edition, no Paraguayan court decisions of specific relevance to the Maquila Regime were identified in the public sources consulted. This record must be understood as the result of the research carried out, not as a statement that no precedents exist.
Most disputes related to the regime tend to arise initially in the administrative sphere, especially in matters of inspection, compliance with obligations, penalties and possible suspension or cancellation of programs. Decree 5714/2026 governs the penalty procedure within the administration of the regime, while Ley nº 6.715/2021 lays down general rules applicable to administrative procedures in Paraguay.
Any disputes brought before the Judiciary must be analyzed according to the nature of the act challenged, the competent authority and the procedural rules applicable to the specific case.15
1.9 Impacts for Brazilians
The expansion of the Maquila Regime is of particular relevance to Brazilian companies and investors, both because of the economic proximity between the two countries and because of Brazil's participation in the production chains linked to the regime.
Exports of goods under maquila grew from approximately USD 160 million in 2013 to USD 1.262 billion in 2025 (USD 1.309 billion including intangible services). The goods series contracted in 2023, to USD 1.004 billion (USD 1.039 billion with services), followed by a recovery in 2024, when it reached USD 1.109 billion (USD 1.141 billion with services; MIC/CNIME, December reports, preliminary data). Between 2013 and 2022, the compound growth of exports was 23.1% per year (CAGR). The complete historical series is presented in Chapter 22.
In the first two months of 2026, exports under the regime kept expanding, up 26% on the same period of 2025. These numbers help to gauge the consolidation of the maquila as an instrument of regional productive integration and its growing use by companies operating between Paraguay, Brazil and other markets.
For the Brazilian business owner, however, the analysis does not end in Paraguay. Setting up or holding a stake in a maquiladora company can also give rise to obligations in Brazil, depending on the structure adopted, the investor's tax residence and the nature of the assets and income involved.
Those obligations include, where applicable, the Capitais Brasileiros no Exterior (CBE) [mandatory declaration to the Central Bank of assets held abroad by Brazilian residents above US$ 1 million (annual) or US$ 100 million (quarterly); rough U.S. parallel: the FBAR and TIC reports, in part] report to the Banco Central do Brasil and the Brazilian rules for taxing investments, profits and shareholdings held abroad. For legal entities, the analysis involves, among other rules, Lei nº 12.973/2014; for individuals, the rules introduced by Lei nº 14.754/2023 must be considered. These topics are examined in depth in the chapters devoted to international taxation and to the tax treatment in Brazil.
The practical consequence is simple: the economic advantage of the maquila must be analyzed on a consolidated basis, considering not only the taxation of the operation in Paraguay but also the tax, reporting and corporate effects produced in Brazil.16
1.10 International Comparisons
Paraguay's Maquila Regime belongs to a broader family of instruments used by different countries to attract investment, stimulate exports and integrate local companies into international production chains. Although there are similarities with programs such as Mexico's IMMEX and with free trade zone regimes, the legal, tax and operational structures are not equivalent.
The comparison below must therefore be read as a comparison of mechanisms, not of effective tax burdens. The bases of incidence, the taxes involved, the conditions of access and the obligations of each regime are different. The economic comparison on harmonized bases is presented in Appendix E (§§E.2 and E.3).
| Feature | Maquila Paraguay | IMMEX Mexico | Free Trade Zone (generic) |
|---|---|---|---|
Main tax mechanism |
1% Single Tax on the national value added or the value of the export invoice, whichever is greater | Temporary import with specific VAT/IEPS treatment and application of the Mexican income tax rules | Tax exemptions or reductions according to the legislation of each jurisdiction |
| Imported inputs | Temporary admission with tax suspension | Temporary import | Exemption or suspension, depending on the regime |
| Domestic market | Up to 10% of the exported volume, notified and taxed | Subject to the rules of the Mexican program itself | Normally depends on nationalization and payment of the applicable taxes |
| Location | May operate anywhere in Paraguayan territory | May operate anywhere in Mexican territory | Normally tied to a delimited geographical area |
| Operating company | Domiciled in Paraguay | Domiciled in Mexico | Established or authorized in the respective zone |
| International contractual relationship | The contract with the foreign parent is part of the structure of the regime | The operation is tied to the authorized program and to international commercial relationships | Varies with the free trade zone model |
The main difference of the Paraguayan maquila lies in the combination of a tax regime of its own, the possibility of operating anywhere in the national territory, and a structure based on a Maquila Program and a contractual relationship with a company domiciled abroad. Mexico's IMMEX, in turn, is strongly structured around temporary import for export production, while free trade zones normally tie their benefits to establishment in specially delimited territorial areas.
These differences rule out comparisons based only on nominal percentages. The choice between regimes depends, among other factors, on the destination market, the origin of inputs, the intensity of labor and capital, logistics, rules of origin, taxation in the investor's jurisdiction and the requirements of substance and compliance.17
TABLE — IMPACT OF THE REFORM ON STRATEGIES WITH MAQUILA
| Aspect | Until 2025 — previous system | 2033+ — full IBS/CBS system | Effect on the maquila |
|---|---|---|---|
| Export of goods | Immunity with litigation and credit blocks. | Express immunity + full credit. | Makes it easier to export Brazilian inputs to a maquila. |
| Export of services | Controversy over “result abroad”. | Clear definition: immune only if the result is abroad. | Improves predictability for maquila services. |
| Credits | Restricted; refunds are bureaucratic. | Broad credit + refund within a defined period. | Reduces the tax cost of the Brazil–Paraguay chain. |
| Rate | Scattered sum (ICMS, PIS/Cofins, ISS). | Higher single reference rate, with more credit. | Focuses on the efficiency of the chain, not on the number of taxes. |
Santos, H. (2019). "Lei de Maquila". Revista de Direito Lusófono.
Pasmor Abogados (2025). "Marco Legal del Régimen de Maquila en Paraguay".
Altra Legal (2020). "Maquila Regime in Paraguay".
1.10.1 Comparative Table — Ley 1064/97 vs. Ley 7547/202518
| Aspect | Ley 1064/97 | Ley 7547/2025 |
|---|---|---|
| In force | 1997–2025 | From 09/Sept/2025 |
| Approval | MIC + Hacienda Bi-Ministerial Resolution | MIC + MEF Bi-Ministerial Resolution |
| CNIME | MIC, Hacienda, BCP, STP, RREE | MIC, MEF, DNIT, BCP, MTESS |
| Executive Secretariat | Held by a representative of the MH | Held by MIC |
| Maquila Services | Mentioned (limited) | Formally included and regulated |
| Digital platform | SOFÍA (DGA) | SIMEX/VUE |
| Permanence period for inputs | 6 months (+6) in the 1997 text; 12 months (+12) since Ley 5408/2015 | 12 months from import, extendable for an equal period (Art. 14 — official text in §1.3) |
| Current Account | Manual/DGA | Computerized system (CNIME + DNIT) |
| Virtual operations | Not provided for | Provided for (Art. 3, item w) |
1.10.2 Executive Summary Table19
| Legal act | Subject | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ley 1064/97 | "De la Industria Maquiladora de Exportación" (On the Export Maquiladora Industry, explanatory translation) — original law | 1997–2025. Passed 13/May/1997, promulgated 03/Jul/1997; succeeded by Ley 7547/2025, which repealed its provisions conflicting with the new law (§11.7). |
| Decree 9585/2000 | Regulations of Ley 1064/97 | 2000–2026. Published 17/Jul/2000; repealed by Decree 5714/2026. |
| Ley 7547/2025 | "Del Régimen de Maquila" — current law, new general framework | Promulgated 08/Sept/2025; in force since 09/Sept/2025. |
| Decree 5714/2026 | Regulations of Ley 7547/2025 | Signed 06/Apr/2026; in force since 06/Apr/2026. |
Legal Basis — Ley 1064/97, Ley 7547/2025 and Decree 5714/2026: the complete history is in the table above; what is currently in force, in the table below.
Current Legal Basis:24
| Legal act | Subject | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ley 7547/2025 | "Del Régimen de Maquila" — current general law | Promulgated on 08/Sept/2025. |
| Decree 5714/2026 | Regulations of Ley 7547/2025 | Signed on 06/Apr/2026. |
| Resolución SE-CNIME 53/2023 | Documentary requirements for program approval | Still referenced by the MIC; not expressly repealed by Res. 14/2026 — status under Ley 7547/2025 to be confirmed with the SE-CNIME. |
| Resolución SE-CNIME 54/2023 | Procedure for certification of the technical coefficients of consumption (INTN) | In force. |
| Resolución SE-CNIME 14/2026 | “Recaudos documentales” and integration into VUE/SIMEX | Consolidates the documentary standard under the new regime. |
The in-depth normative analysis of the legal basis is housed in Chapters 6 (Ley 1064/97), 7 (Decree 9585/2000), 8 (Ley 7547/2025) and 9 (Decree 5714/2026). The tables above remain in this chapter as an executive summary.
End of the sample. The book continues in the following chapters.
