Free sample
Maquila Demystified — Volume 3
This is the beginning of the book, exactly as in the file you receive when you buy it: from the opening pages through the end of the first chapter.
Maquila Demystified — Volume 3
MAQUILA DEMYSTIFIED
Volume 3

MAQUILA DEMYSTIFIED
Economic and Tax Implications in Brazil
Volume 3
Producing in Paraguay, competing in Brazil
Operations in Paraguay. Implications for Brazil.
Tax treatment in Brazil · Transfer pricing and tax residence · Implementation and comparison of regimes
Devanir Alves Campos
Maquila Demystified: producing in Paraguay, competing in Brazil — the regime, taxes, labor cost and the Tax Reform
Volume 3 — Economic and Tax Implications in Brazil
by Devanir Alves Campos
ISNI: 0000 0005 3065 9612
© TAG Fields, 2026
All rights reserved.
Documentary research collaboration: Aline Francielle F. Campos
Translation and editorial adaptation by OrbinHUB with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
ISBN: 978-65-82201-08-0
Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP)
(Câmara Brasileira do Livro, SP, Brasil)
Campos, Devanir Alves
Maquila demystified [livro eletrônico] :
economic and tax implications in Brazil /
Alves Campos ; tradução OrbinHUB. --
Balneário Camboriú, SC : TAG Fields, 2026. --
(Maquila demystified ; 3)
ePub
Título original: Maquila sem mistério.
ISBN 978-65-82201-08-0
1. Brasil - Relações econômicas 2. Exportação
3. Industrialização 4. Isenção tributária
5. Reforma tributária 6. Relações econômicas
internacionais 7. Tributação - Leis e legislação
I. Título II. Série.
26-404910.0 CDD-337
Índices para catálogo sistemático:
1. Relações econômicas internacionais 337
Aline Graziele Benitez - Bibliotecária - CRB-1/3129
Legal Notice
This work is informational and educational in purpose and does not replace legal, accounting, tax or regulatory advice. Although prepared with technical rigor and based on official sources, its application depends on the circumstances of each case and on the legislation in force at the time of the decision.
Readers are advised to validate the information with licensed professionals. The author and the publisher accept no liability for decisions taken without proper analysis of the specific case.
All rights reserved. The reproduction, storage or transmission of this work, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization of the publisher is prohibited, except in the cases permitted by applicable law.
TAG Fields Inteligência Tributária Ltda.
tagfields.net | info@tagfields.net
Social media: @tagfields
1st edition: 2026
METHODOLOGICAL NOTE
Copyright © 2026 TAG Fields Inteligência Tributária Ltda. All rights reserved.
1st edition — September 2026.
Normative basis and sources verified through September 2026, with emphasis, in Paraguay, on Ley 7547/2025 and Decree 5714/2026 and, in Brazil, on EC nº 132/2023 [Constitutional Amendment], LC nº 214/2025 [Complementary Law], Leis [Laws] nº 14.754/2023 and nº 14.596/2023, as well as the updates to IN RFB nº 1.037/2010 [Normative Instruction].
This work is technical, informational and educational in nature. Although it was prepared on the basis of extensive documentary research, giving priority to official sources, its content does not constitute or replace legal, tax, accounting, customs, regulatory or business advice specific to a given operation.
Legislation, regulations and administrative practice are subject to change. For that reason, any business decision must be preceded by verification of the rules in force and applicable to the specific case and, where necessary, by analysis by licensed professionals in the jurisdictions involved.
Throughout the work, priority was given to primary and official sources, including laws, decrees, resolutions, regulations, administrative acts and publications of the competent bodies. Where there are divergent interpretations, no express provision, or questions that depend on the circumstances of the specific case, those limitations are presented transparently, in accordance with the methodological criteria adopted in this work.
Whenever relevant, topics are examined in their legal, tax, customs, operational, financial and strategic dimensions, so that the reader understands not only the content of the applicable rules but also their practical implications for structuring and for business decision-making.
DEDICATION
I dedicate this work, first of all, to God, the source of resilience, wisdom, direction and purpose at every stage of this journey.
To my wife, Aline, and to my children, Augusto (in memoriam), Liz and Theo, for the love, the understanding and the precious support during the journey that gave birth to this blessed book.
To my parents, João (in memoriam) and Santina, and to my siblings, for the perseverance, the values and the unconditional love that shaped the foundations of who I am.
To all Brazilian business owners – persevering heroes who believe that internationalization is a strategic opportunity to build companies that are more competitive, more resilient and better prepared for the future, in which their efforts allow them to look at the business itself rather than at the adversities of the environment.
I also dedicate this work to the professionals who, every day, face the complexity of Latin America's tax, customs and regulatory environments and who seek technical knowledge to make safer decisions, promote economic development and create value for society.
A special dedication to the beloved Paraguayan people and their leaders who, by wise decision, chose to embrace prosperity with a warm welcome to those who dream of building legacies, offering a fair, safe and streamlined environment to foreign entrepreneurs and forming a solid base to further strengthen Paraguay's position as a world reference in competitiveness and economic freedom.
May this work help to reduce barriers, expand opportunities, strengthen the economic integration between Brazil and Paraguay and encourage productive investment, job creation, innovation and business cooperation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was only possible thanks to the work carried out, over decades, by countless public and private institutions, researchers, professionals and agents who contributed to building and deepening knowledge about foreign trade, regional integration, international taxation, economic development and industrial competitiveness.
I extend my appreciation to the authorities, government bodies and other institutions that took part in the evolution and improvement of Paraguay's Maquila Regime, as well as to the entities that make available legislation, statistics, technical standards, studies, data and public information indispensable to research of this nature. The existence and quality of those sources make it possible to turn complex subjects into knowledge that is accessible, verifiable and useful for decision-making.
I also thank the business owners and members of the Cámara de Comercio Paraguay Brasil (CCPB), the Câmara de Comércio França-Brasil (CCFB), C12, Legendários, SAE Brasil, FIEP and ABIMAQ, as well as the countless clients, collaborators, teachers, friends, colleagues, partners and professionals with whom I have had the opportunity to live, learn and work throughout my career. The shared experiences, the challenges faced, the technical discussions and the accumulated lessons contributed significantly to the practical, multidisciplinary view presented in this book.
I extend my gratitude to the professionals and interlocutors who, at different moments, shared knowledge, experience, information, inspirations, questions and perspectives that contributed directly or indirectly to the making of this work. Each conversation, collaboration or experience added important elements to the understanding of the challenges faced by companies that operate, or intend to operate, in international environments.
Among them, I extend special, cordial and warm thanks to: Adolfo D’Ecclesiis • Alain Tissier • Alessandro Meliso Rodrigues • Aline Francielle Fracasso Campos • André Soares • Andreia Pinto • Anísio Romanini • Daniel Bergman • Dario Mechi • Edemilson Pinto Vieira • Eliane Lermen • Felipe Couto • Fernando Gonçalves Neto • Gilberto Schorr Grossl • Helio Samora • Ivo José Charvet • Joaquim Ferraz Martins Filho • John Peter Klein • Jorge Nishimura • José Ricardo Nogueira • Kenneth Stanley Kolpus • Luciano Pinto de Almeida • Luiz Bohatch • Luiz Osório Moraes Panza • Luiz Roberto de Souza • Marcelo Iwersen • Maria do Carmo da Silva • Marta Lorena Achucarro • Michel Rojo de Andrade • Pablo Kubo • Rafael Justus Barreto • Ruy Alves Henriques Filho • Sergio Sartori Junior • Sergio Simonetti • Stefan Sjogren • Stephane Wenceslas Raoul Klein • Thiago Nieweglowski • Vinicius Rossato • Wuil Carlo Manika.
Finally, I thank my family, whose understanding, patience, support and encouragement made it possible to devote the time and energy needed to turn years of study, research and professional experience into a work that hopes to contribute to knowledge, to more conscious business decisions and to stronger economic integration between Brazil and Paraguay.
To everyone who, in some way, contributed to this journey and to the making of this book, I record my sincere thanks.
FOREWORD TO VOLUME 3
I met Devanir about fifteen years ago, from the customer’s side. He owned an engineering company whose services I contracted, and our relationship began the way so many begin in industry: with deadlines, deliveries, specifications and, naturally, some pressure. Over time, however, I realized there was something there that went beyond a good supplier. With each project, each difficult conversation, it became clearer that we agreed on what really matters: that one’s word is as good as a contract, that a problem well understood is already half solved and that, behind any operation, there are people who deserve respect.
It was that alignment of values that turned a business relationship into friendship. And it is because of it that I am here, writing these lines.
Over those years, I was also able to follow the path of someone who never stopped learning. Devanir began as a designer at the drawing board, drawing parts and assemblies. He grew, qualified as an engineer, went into business and built his own engineering company. And he did not stop there: he went back to the books as many times as he judged necessary and also became a business administrator, an accountant, an economist and a lawyer. Few people I know can look at the same problem through the eyes of the engineer, the entrepreneur, the manager, the economist and the jurist. It is that versatility, built through effort and not by chance, that allows Devanir to read the landscape from different points of view and that gives this book its greatest quality.
I must be honest with the reader from the outset: I am not a specialist in Maquila, in international taxation or in foreign trade. My professional life was built in industry, first in consumer goods, then in agricultural machinery, where we learn early that an idea is only worth something when it works on the production line and, later, in the field, in the farmer’s hands, in the short window of each harvest. When Devanir invited me to write this foreword, my first reaction was to ask whether I was the right person. Today I think I understand the invitation. This book was not written only for specialists. It was also written for those who, like me, need to make decisions without having all the technical answers at hand.
And that is exactly how I read it: with the questions of a manager, not of a tax specialist. I expected a dry text, full of articles of law. I found rigor, but above all clarity. Devanir has the gift of taking a complicated subject and organizing it so that a layperson can follow it and, more importantly, can ask the right questions. He does not promise that Maquila is for everyone. On the contrary: he devotes a good part of the effort to showing when it does not make sense. Few works have that courage.
There is one subject, however, that stayed with me throughout the reading, and that I cannot fail to mention. Anyone who has worked in Brazilian industry for some time knows that we are living through a long and painful process of deindustrialization. Over my career, I have seen suppliers close their doors, production chains shrink and fellow professionals lose ground. Industry, which was once the engine of the country’s economy, has carried less and less weight year after year, squeezed by high interest rates, a complex tax system, the uncertainty of the rules and costs that never seem to stop rising.
That is why I admit I opened this book with a certain discomfort. Would a book that teaches how to produce in Paraguay not be, in some way, contributing to hollowing out our industry?
I finished the reading with a different view. I understood that Maquila is not the cause of the Brazilian problem, but a reflection of it. Companies do not look across the border for lack of love for Brazil, but because, very often, that is the way to go on existing. And, when done well, that decision can be complementary: some stages of production cross the border, while engineering, development, suppliers and the market stay here. The author himself sums this up in a sentence I have kept: “labor-intensive production travels well; the laboratory does not.” In many cases, the real alternative is not keeping everything in Brazil, but losing the product, the factory and the customer to a competitor from another continent.
That does not lessen the urgency for Brazil to face its own difficulties. But it made me see this book not as an exit manual, but as a tool for Brazilian companies to remain competitive.
There is something else I recognized in these pages, and it has more to do with the author than with the subject. This volume deals with people: with hiring, rights, obligations, and the care for those who will work in the operation. That does not surprise me. Over these years, I have always seen Devanir treat his employees as part of a commitment, and not as numbers on a spreadsheet. That mark is present here, in the way he reminds us, at every turn, that a business decision is only a good one if it also works for those who will carry it out.
The book’s honesty also caught my attention: Devanir says clearly what is certain, what is interpretation and what still needs to be confirmed, and even invites the reader who finds an error to let him know. In a subject surrounded by easy promises, that humility is rare.
For all these reasons, accepting this invitation was, for me, a way of repaying fifteen years of companionship, learning and friendship.
May the reader find here what I found: not a shortcut, but a map. And, along with it, the company of an author who has shown me, for so many years, that technical competence and solid values not only can go together, but always should.
Sergio Sartori Junior
Director of Research and Development — Máquinas Agrícolas Jacto S.A.
HOW TO USE THIS BOOK
Although organized in sequential chapters, this book was conceived as a manual for permanent reference. Each chapter can be read independently, according to the reader's needs.
Business owners will find a strategic view for evaluating investments; lawyers can deepen the normative analysis; accountants will have an integrated view of the tax impacts; executives will understand the operational and governance aspects; and consultants can use the comparative tables, decision flows and checklists as support tools for internationalization projects.
Throughout the work, several resources were built in to make the practical application of the knowledge easier, among them comparative tables, technical tables, case studies, checklists, flowcharts, executive alerts, frequently asked questions, good practices, main risks and strategic recommendations.
Whenever relevant, topics are examined from three complementary perspectives: Brazil, Paraguay and the international context. Several chapters also incorporate the effects of the Brazilian Tax Reform, allowing the reader to assess how legislative changes may influence present and future business decisions.
The three-volume series. This work is published in three volumes: Volume 1 — The Regime and Its Legal Framework (Chapters 1 to 12, with 4-A, and the Entrepreneur's Toolkit); Volume 2 — Operating in Paraguay (Chapters 13 to 38, with Appendices I to IV, next to Chapter 25); Volume 3 — Economic and Tax Implications in Brazil (Chapters 39 to 45-G, with Appendices D and E). The numbering of chapters, sections, examples, figures and tables is that of the complete work and does not change from one volume to another; a cross-reference to a chapter not in the volume in hand is located through Appendix A, present in all three volumes. The sources (Appendix B), the glossaries, the list of acronyms and the index of each volume cover its own content; the complete glossaries are in Volume 3.
Conventions used in this collection
The statements in this work rest, whenever possible, on verified primary sources, such as official legal texts, government publications and documents issued by the competent bodies, indicated in the body of the text and in the footnotes.
The provenance of each statement is made explicit in the text itself. When a conclusion follows from a reasoned interpretation rather than from an express normative provision, that is indicated. Likewise, when a given piece of information still depends on official confirmation or on the circumstances of the specific case, the work identifies the point to be confirmed and, whenever possible, the competent body or the licensed professional responsible for that validation.
The points where verification is indispensable are consolidated in the Consolidated Table of Local-Validation Alerts, located in the References section and organized under three categories:
CONFIRMED — the statement is supported by a verified primary source, such as an official legal text, a government publication, a document of the competent body or another primary source whose validity has been checked.
PROBABLE — the conclusion follows from a reasoned interpretation of the normative text, of legal scholarship, of documented administrative practice or of convergent institutional sources, with no express provision capable of settling the question entirely.
REQUIRES LOCAL VALIDATION — the rule does not expressly settle a given point — such as a procedure, deadline, amount, requirement or interpretation — or its application depends on the concrete circumstances of the operation. In those cases, the answer must be confirmed with the competent body, in Paraguay or in Brazil, depending on the subject, or submitted to the analysis of a licensed professional.
The highest-risk points falling under this last category are indexed in the Consolidated Table of Local-Validation Alerts. In the body of the work, however, the caveat appears in the wording itself, indicating what must be verified, why and, where applicable, with whom. No specific visual markings are used in the running text to identify those situations.
This category must not be confused with a verification gap. There is a verification gap when the rule or the competent source contains the answer, but the corresponding data or document could not be accessed or confirmed during the preparation of this edition. In those cases, the work itself reports the limitation and, where relevant, the verification attempts made. It is a pending editorial verification, not an obligation transferred to the reader.
General verification rule. No statement in this work dispenses with checking the legislation in force and the concrete circumstances on the date of the decision. The wording itself seeks to indicate the nature and provenance of each statement, while the Consolidated Table of Local-Validation Alerts identifies the points where confirmation with a competent body or licensed professional is indispensable.
Validation tools. Module 24 of the Entrepreneur's Toolkit consolidates, by project phase, the topics that must be examined with the respective advisors before a decision is made. The Consolidated Table of Local-Validation Alerts, in turn, gathers the highest-risk points whose confirmation is indispensable. These tools complement the caveats inserted directly in the body of the text.
Section suffixes. Sections identified by suffixes, such as 5.4.1-B, deal with developments of the same topic and are a normal part of the numbering. The numbering adopted and the respective internal cross-references remain valid.
Sources. The references used are indicated in the body of the text and in the footnotes, and consolidated in the appendices and in the References section. As a general rule, the normative basis of this edition reflects the legislation in force through September 2026. The methodological conventions and the reliability criteria adopted are presented in this section and detailed in the Methodological Note.
Business owners interested in implementing maquila operations are advised to read the whole work before starting any project, since several concepts presented in the opening chapters are the basis for understanding the analyses, risks and decisions dealt with in later sections.
IF YOU ARE NOT BRAZILIAN, READ IT THIS WAY
This book was written from Brazil, with Brazilian business owners, accountants and lawyers as its original audience. The editions in other languages reproduce the same work, with no cuts or additions specific to other jurisdictions. This section therefore exists so that the reader from any country knows, before starting to read, which contents can be used directly, which reflect specifically the Brazilian reality, and which questions need to be examined in light of the legislation of their own jurisdiction.
What applies regardless of the investor's country of origin. The structure of the Maquila Regime is governed by Paraguayan legislation. Ley 7547/2025 and Decree 5714/2026 (Chapters 8 and 9), the maquila program (Chapter 19), the contract (Chapter 20), the submaquila (Chapter 21), the customs procedures — temporary import, export, re-export, guarantees and inspection (Chapters 26 to 32) —, the Mercosur rules of origin (§27.5), the Single Tax (Chapter 33), the Paraguayan VAT — IVA, Impuesto al Valor Agregado (Chapter 34), the IRE (Chapter 35), the IDU (Chapter 36), the INR (Chapter 37), Pillar 2 (§38.6 and §§38.12 to 38.14) and Paraguay's treaty network (§38.2) are part of the Paraguayan legal framework and therefore do not depend on the investor's nationality. The same principle applies to the Paraguayan corporate structure (Chapters 13 and 14), to hiring staff and the IPS (Chapters 41 and 45-A), to foreign exchange and remittances (Chapter 45-E) and to the implementation roadmap presented in the Toolkit.
What is specifically Brazilian. The tax treatment of the partner, investor or controlling company in its home jurisdiction varies with the legislation of each country. In this work, Brazil is the case analyzed in depth, especially in Chapter 39 and its developments (39-A, 39-B and 39-C), in the structures examined in Chapter 15, in the reporting of assets held abroad dealt with in §45-E.6 and in the general regimes compared in Appendix E (§E.2).
On those points, Brazil works as a case for applying the method, not as the geographical limit of the work. Brazilian legislation is examined because it is the home jurisdiction adopted as the reference and because it makes it possible to show, with numbers, legal provisions, assumptions and failure modes, how the analysis must be structured. Conclusions based on Brazilian legislation must not be automatically applied to tax residents of other countries; they do serve, however, as a model for identifying the questions that need answering in each reader's jurisdiction.
The five questions for your own jurisdiction. They are essentially the same questions that Chapter 39 examines for Brazil. The reader from another country should take them to their local advisors. The references to Brazilian legislation indicated below work as an example of method, not as an answer applicable to other jurisdictions.
(i) Is there a controlled foreign company (CFC) regime capable of reaching the profit of the Paraguayan entity before it is distributed? In Brazil, there are specific rules on the subject, examined in §39.1 — for individuals, under Lei nº 14.754/2023, and for legal entities, under Lei nº 12.973/2014 —, as well as in §§15.4 and 38.5. If the reader's jurisdiction has no CFC rules, the taxation of the income may follow a different logic; if it does, their effects must be recalculated under local legislation.
(ii) Is there a double tax treaty between your country and Paraguay — and is it in force? Brazil has no treaty of that kind in force with Paraguay (§38.1). Paraguay's network of international treaties is examined in §38.2, country by country. The existence of a treaty can significantly change the treatment of dividends, interest, royalties and certain services. In the absence of a treaty, the domestic rules of each of the jurisdictions involved must be examined, a situation addressed in §38.8.
(iii) How does your jurisdiction tax dividends or profits received from abroad, and which taxes paid in Paraguay can be used as a credit? In the Brazilian case, the taxation of the results of controlled companies abroad and the credit mechanisms follow their own rules, examined in §39.1 and, as to the creditability of the Single Tax, in §38.8. The Paraguayan IDU and INR are examined in Chapters 36 and 37. Those taxes belong to the analysis of Paraguayan legislation; the treatment given to them by the investor's jurisdiction of residence must be determined under the legislation of that country.
(iv) Are there transfer pricing rules applicable to transactions with related parties in Paraguay? Chapter 40 examines the two dimensions in the Brazil–Paraguay case: Paraguayan legislation and Brazilian legislation, including the effects of the new Brazilian transfer pricing regime (§40.13). The analysis corresponding to Paraguay is part of the local legislation applicable to the operation; the other end must be examined under the rules of the country of origin, including methods, documentation, ancillary obligations and deadlines.
(v) Is there an obligation to report shareholdings, assets or investments held abroad — and what are its thresholds and conditions? In Brazil, certain positions abroad are subject to the Capitais Brasileiros no Exterior (Brazilian Capital Abroad) report to the Central Bank, subject to the applicable thresholds, criteria and frequency (§45-E.6), in addition to the obligations related to taxation and to the income tax return examined in Chapter 15. In other jurisdictions, the existence of the obligation, its thresholds, frequency, form of reporting and the consequences of any non-compliance must be checked.
The essential warning. The answers provided by Brazilian legislation cannot be automatically transported to another jurisdiction. Rates, deadlines, thresholds, obligations and consequences described specifically for Brazil apply only when the respective assumptions of Brazilian legislation are present. This work does not seek to ascertain, estimate or presume the domestic legislation of all other home jurisdictions.
What can be transported is the method of analysis: separating what belongs to Paraguayan legislation from what belongs to the investor's home jurisdiction; answering the five questions before making any calculation; demanding a provision, a validity date and a source for each conclusion; and identifying, in each alternative, its conditions of application, limitations and failure modes.
With that distinction, the reader from any country can use directly the analysis of the Paraguayan legal framework presented in this work and take the Brazilian case as a methodological reference for identifying the questions that must be examined in light of the legislation of their own jurisdiction.
Reference table — Brazilian institutions and terms and their rough U.S. parallel. Each term receives, at its first appearance in this book, a short explanation in brackets; this table gathers those explanations together with the limits of each comparison. The parallels are functional approximations verified at official Brazilian and U.S. sources (consulted October 15, 2026), never legal identity: they do not transplant one country’s rules onto the other. Where no equivalent exists, the table says so.
| Brazilian term | What it is in Brazil | Rough U.S. parallel | Limits of the comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBS | Brazilian subnational value-added tax on goods and services, shared by states and municipalities, created by the 2023 consumption-tax reform. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; there is no VAT at any level, and state and local general sales taxes are single-stage retail taxes, not credit-invoice taxes. |
| CBS | Brazilian federal value-added tax on goods and services, created by the 2023 consumption-tax reform to replace PIS and Cofins. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; the federal government levies no general consumption tax, only selective excise taxes on specific goods and activities. |
| CFC | Brazilian rules taxing a resident owner on profits of foreign controlled companies: Law 12.973/2014 for corporations, Law 14.754/2023 for individuals. | Subpart F and net CFC tested income (formerly GILTI) rules, IRC §§ 951 and 951A, for U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations | The U.S. rules apply to corporate and individual U.S. shareholders alike with income-category tests, ownership thresholds and rates that differ from the Brazilian unconditional corporate inclusion and the 15% individual regime. |
| LC 214/2025 | Brazilian complementary law that institutes the IBS, the CBS and the Selective Tax, detailing the consumption-tax reform. | Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 of the United States Code, as the federal statute instituting and regulating federal taxes | The analogy is only one of legal rank (statute instituting taxes); the Internal Revenue Code contains no VAT and covers only federal taxes, while LC 214 also governs a subnational tax. |
| EC 132/2023 | Brazilian constitutional amendment that reformed consumption taxation, authorizing the IBS, the CBS and the Selective Tax. | Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as the constitutional amendment that authorized a federal tax | The parallel is only formal (a tax authorized by constitutional amendment); the Sixteenth Amendment concerns income tax, not consumption taxes, and the U.S. has had no consumption-tax reform of this kind. |
| ICMS | Brazilian state-level tax on the circulation of goods and on interstate and intermunicipal transport and communication services. | State and local general sales and use taxes, levied by individual states and localities | U.S. sales taxes are single-stage retail taxes with no credit mechanism, no federal framework law, rates set by each state, and some states levy none; the ICMS is a multi-stage credit tax. |
| CSLL | Brazilian federal social contribution levied on corporate net profit, alongside corporate income tax, to finance social security. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; corporate profit is taxed only by the federal corporate income tax (IRC § 11, 21%), with no separate earmarked profit-based contribution. |
| Receita Federal | Brazilian federal agency that administers internal taxes and customs, auditing, collecting and ruling on federal taxes and foreign trade. | Function split: Internal Revenue Service (federal tax administration) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (customs and trade enforcement) | In the U.S. tax and customs are two agencies under different departments (Treasury and Homeland Security), and neither administers state taxes. |
| IRPJ | Brazilian federal corporate income tax, 15% plus a 10% surcharge on profit above a monthly threshold, computed under real, presumed or arbitrated profit. | Federal corporate income tax, IRC § 11, at a flat 21% on taxable income, reported on Form 1120 | Rates and base differ (21% flat versus 15% + 10%), the U.S. has no presumed-profit option, and most U.S. states add their own corporate income tax. |
| Imposto Seletivo | Brazilian federal excise created by the tax reform on goods and services harmful to health or the environment. | Federal excise taxes on specific goods, services and activities (IRC Subtitles D and E), administered by the IRS and, for alcohol and tobacco, the TTB | U.S. excises are a long-standing patchwork of product-specific taxes with no unified 'harmful goods' rationale; lists, rates and bases do not match the Selective Tax. |
| PIS/Cofins | Brazilian federal social contributions computed on a company's gross revenue, to be replaced by the CBS under the tax reform. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; the federal government levies no tax on gross revenue, and the few gross-receipts taxes that exist are state-level and unrelated to social security. |
| ISS | Brazilian municipal tax on services of any nature, levied by municipalities and the Federal District under a federal complementary law. | State and local general sales taxes, to the extent a state or locality chooses to tax services | Most U.S. sales taxes reach goods and only selected services, are not a dedicated municipal services tax, and have no national list of taxable services. |
| IN RFB | Sub-statutory regulation issued by the Receita Federal, a complementary norm of tax law under art. 100 of the National Tax Code. | Treasury Regulations and IRS Revenue Procedures, the administrative guidance issued under the Internal Revenue Code | Treasury Regulations are issued jointly by Treasury and the IRS after notice-and-comment rulemaking and carry different deference rules; a Revenue Procedure is closer in rank but narrower in scope. |
| IPI | Brazilian federal tax on manufactured products, domestic or imported, with rates set per product in a tariff-style table. | Federal manufacturers excise taxes, IRC Subtitle D, Chapter 32 | U.S. manufacturers excises reach only a short list of goods (automotive items, coal, vaccines, recreational equipment), whereas the IPI is a broad tax across the whole product table. |
| IRPF | Brazilian federal personal income tax with progressive monthly brackets up to 27.5%, plus a reduction mechanism for lower incomes. | Federal individual income tax, IRC § 1, with progressive brackets up to 37%, filed on Form 1040 | Brackets, rates, filing status, deductions and the annual-versus-monthly computation differ, and most U.S. states also tax personal income. |
| IRRF | Brazilian income tax withheld at source by the payer on salaries, services and payments abroad, reported to the Receita Federal. | Function split: wage withholding under IRC § 3402 and withholding on U.S.-source payments to foreign persons under IRC §§ 1441–1443 (NRA withholding, generally 30%) | The U.S. does not withhold on most domestic business-to-business service payments, and its 30% cross-border rate, treaty reductions and definitions differ from the Brazilian tables. |
| CIDE | Brazilian federal contribution of 10% on payments abroad for technology licensing, technical services and related know-how. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; payments abroad for royalties or services are reached only by income-tax withholding (IRC §§ 1441–1442), not by a separate economic-intervention levy. |
| BCB | Brazilian central bank, which issues currency, conducts monetary policy, controls credit and supervises financial institutions. | Federal Reserve System, the central bank of the United States | Bank supervision in the U.S. is shared with the OCC, FDIC and state regulators, and the Fed neither administers foreign-exchange rules nor receives declarations of residents' assets abroad. |
| CBE | Mandatory declaration to the Central Bank of assets held abroad by Brazilian residents above US$ 1 million (annual) or US$ 100 million (quarterly). | Function split: FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) for foreign financial accounts over US$ 10,000, and Treasury International Capital (TIC) statistical reports | The FBAR covers only financial accounts, has a far lower threshold and is an anti-money-laundering filing, while TIC reporting is statistical; neither is a central-bank asset census. |
| Drawback | Brazilian special customs regime suspending, exempting or refunding taxes on imported inputs used in exported products. | Duty drawback administered by CBP under 19 U.S.C. § 1313, refunding duties, taxes and fees on imported goods that are exported or destroyed | U.S. drawback is essentially a refund after export (up to 99%), without the suspension modality that dominates Brazilian practice, and does not cover state taxes. |
| IOF | Brazilian federal tax on credit, foreign-exchange, insurance and securities transactions, with rates set by decree. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; there is no federal tax on credit, FX or securities transactions, and the only comparable levy is the narrow excise on premiums paid to foreign insurers (IRC § 4371). |
| RECOF | Brazilian special customs regime letting a company import or buy inputs with federal taxes suspended, under computerized control, for industrialization and export. | Foreign-Trade Zones, where merchandise may be stored, manipulated or manufactured without being subject to customs laws until entered (19 U.S.C. § 81c) | An FTZ is a physical designated area supervised by CBP and suspends only customs duties, whereas RECOF is a company-based authorization that also suspends internal federal taxes. |
| Lucro Real | Brazilian corporate income tax regime in which IRPJ and CSLL are computed on actual book profit adjusted by tax additions and exclusions. | Regular computation of corporate taxable income under IRC § 11, reported on Form 1120 | In the U.S. actual taxable income is the only method for all corporations, so 'Lucro Real' is not an elective regime there; adjustments, loss rules and rates differ. |
| CARF | Brazilian federal administrative tax court, a joint body of government and taxpayer representatives, hearing appeals against first-instance tax rulings. | Function split: IRS Independent Office of Appeals (administrative) and the United States Tax Court (judicial pre-payment forum under IRC § 6213) | Appeals is an internal IRS office, not a paritary tribunal, and the Tax Court is a court whose decisions bind both sides; CARF decisions bind only the administration. |
| ZFM | Brazilian free-trade area in the Amazon with special federal tax incentives to build an industrial, commercial and agricultural hub. | Foreign-Trade Zones program (19 U.S.C. §§ 81a–81u), administered by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board and supervised by CBP | FTZs only defer, reduce or eliminate customs duties; they carry none of the income-tax, IPI or ICMS incentives of Manaus and are not a regional development policy. |
| CNPJ | Brazilian national registry number identifying companies and other entities before the Receita Federal for tax and legal purposes. | Employer Identification Number (EIN), the federal tax identification number of a business entity issued by the IRS | An EIN is purely a federal tax identifier; it is not a public registry of corporate data, and company formation and registration are state matters. |
| FGTS | Brazilian employer-funded severance fund: 8% of each worker's monthly pay deposited into an individual account the worker draws on dismissal and other events. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; federal and state unemployment-insurance payroll taxes fund pooled benefits, not individual worker accounts, and there is no statutory severance deposit. |
| INSS | Brazilian social-security contributions: employer pays 20% on payroll and employees pay progressive rates, financing public pensions and benefits. | Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes (FICA): 6.2% + 6.2% Social Security up to a wage base and 1.45% + 1.45% Medicare | Rates, wage caps and benefit design differ (12.4% + 2.9% combined, capped Social Security), and the U.S. has no separate social-security agency collecting the contributions; the IRS does. |
| Siscomex | Brazilian integrated foreign-trade system that registers, monitors and controls import and export operations for customs, trade and exchange authorities. | Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), CBP's single window through which trade reports imports and exports and agencies decide admissibility | ACE is run by CBP alone and does not integrate foreign-exchange control, which in the U.S. does not exist; module names, licensing and data fields do not correspond. |
| Simples Nacional | Brazilian unified simplified tax regime that lets micro and small companies pay several federal, state and municipal taxes in one monthly payment. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; small businesses use pass-through forms (sole proprietorship, S corporation) within the ordinary income tax, with no unified multi-tax payment. |
| DCTF/ECF | Brazilian federal ancillary filings: the DCTF declares federal tax debits and credits; the ECF is the digital accounting-tax bookkeeping supporting IRPJ/CSLL computation. | Function split: Form 941 (quarterly employment-tax return) and Form 1120 (corporate income tax return with book-tax reconciliation) | U.S. returns both declare and compute the tax; there is no separate debt-confession declaration nor a full digital bookkeeping file transmitted to the IRS. |
| STF/STJ | Brazil's two top courts: the STF guards the Constitution and may issue binding precedents; the STJ unifies interpretation of federal law. | Supreme Court of the United States, the highest court, created by Article III of the Constitution | The U.S. has one top court for both constitutional and federal-law questions, with discretionary review, and state supreme courts are final on state law. |
| IRPFM | Brazilian minimum personal income tax under Law 15.270/2025: up to 10% on annual income above R$ 600,000, crediting tax already paid. | Alternative Minimum Tax for individuals, IRC § 55, ensuring high-income taxpayers pay at least a minimum amount of tax | The AMT recomputes taxable income with disallowed preferences at 26%/28%, rather than applying a flat floor to total income including dividends; thresholds and mechanics differ. |
| CLT | Brazilian consolidated labor code governing individual and collective employment relations, including the statutory definition of employee. | Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.), setting minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping and youth-employment standards | The U.S. has no comprehensive labor code; the FLSA covers only pay and hours, employment is largely at-will, and many protections are state law or absent. |
| Súmula | Short numbered statement summarizing a Brazilian court's settled case law; STF súmulas vinculantes bind other courts and public administration. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; precedent binds through the decisions themselves (stare decisis), and courts issue no separate numbered summaries with autonomous binding force. |
| Lucro Presumido | Brazilian optional corporate regime computing IRPJ/CSLL on a presumed profit margin (e.g., 8% or 32%) of gross revenue, for companies below a revenue ceiling. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; corporations always compute tax on actual taxable income, and no presumed-margin election exists. |
| CPF | Brazilian individual taxpayer registry number, managed by the Receita Federal and used as the citizen's identifier for tax and public services. | Function split: Social Security Number (SSN, issued by the SSA) and Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN, issued by the IRS) | The SSN is a social-security number that doubles as tax ID, while the ITIN is tax-only for people ineligible for an SSN; neither is a universal civil identifier like the CPF. |
| Lei do Bem | Brazilian Law 11.196/2005 granting automatic tax incentives for research and technological innovation to companies taxed under Lucro Real. | Federal research credit, IRC § 41 (credit for increasing research activities), claimed on Form 6765 | The U.S. incentive is an incremental tax credit on qualified research expenses, not a super-deduction, and carries no IPI or depreciation components; eligibility rules differ. |
| INPI | Brazilian federal agency granting patents and registering trademarks, industrial designs, software and technology-transfer contracts. | United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the Commerce Department agency granting patents and registering trademarks | The USPTO does not register software (copyright, handled by the Copyright Office) nor record technology-transfer contracts for tax or FX purposes. |
| Radar/Habilitação | Mandatory Receita Federal enrollment (Siscomex habilitação) a company needs to import or export, with modalities tied to its financial capacity. | Importer identity record with CBP (CBP Form 5106), required before filing the first formal import entry | CBP registration is a simple identity record with no financial-capacity tiers or value limits; U.S. risk control works through customs bonds, not through enrollment modalities. |
| eSocial | Brazilian unified digital system through which employers report labor, social-security and tax obligations in one submission. | Function split: wage reporting to the Social Security Administration (Forms W-2) and employment-tax returns to the IRS (Form 941) | There is no single federal window; employers file separately with SSA, IRS and state agencies, and event-based reporting of hires and terminations is largely a state matter. |
| COSIT | Receita Federal's general tax coordination that answers formal taxpayer consultations; its rulings bind the agency and protect taxpayers in the same situation. | Function split: IRS Private Letter Rulings (binding only for the requesting taxpayer) and Revenue Rulings (published general interpretations) | A PLR may not be relied on by other taxpayers, unlike a Solução de Consulta Cosit, and Revenue Rulings are issued by the IRS at its own initiative, not in response to consultations. |
| pró-labore | Pay received by a Brazilian partner or director for work in the company, taxed as employment-type income and subject to social-security contribution, unlike dividends. | Reasonable compensation paid as wages to shareholder-employees of S corporations before non-wage distributions | The U.S. concept exists to police employment taxes in pass-through entities; C-corporation dividends are taxable, and partners receive guaranteed payments (IRC § 707(c)), so the wage/dividend split has different stakes. |
| carnê-leão | Monthly personal income tax a Brazilian resident must pay on income received from other individuals or from abroad, when not withheld at source. | Estimated tax payments (Form 1040-ES) on income not covered by withholding | U.S. estimated tax is quarterly, not monthly, and applies to any under-withheld income (self-employment, interest, dividends), not specifically to income from individuals or abroad. |
| pejotização | Brazilian practice of hiring a worker through a one-person company to disguise an employment relationship and avoid labor rights; its limits are under STF review. | Worker misclassification: treating an employee as an independent contractor, assessed by the IRS common-law test and the DOL under the FLSA | U.S. misclassification turns on control tests applied agency by agency and does not hinge on the worker holding a company; consequences are employment taxes and FLSA pay, not the full Brazilian labor package. |
| MEI | Brazilian simplified regime for sole proprietors with revenue up to R$ 81,000 a year and at most one employee, paying fixed monthly amounts. | No direct equivalent | No direct equivalent in the United States; a sole proprietor simply reports on Schedule C and pays self-employment tax, with no fixed monthly payment, revenue cap or special status. |
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
List of the acronyms and abbreviations most used in this work, with the official name in the original language and, where useful, the translation or explanation in English.
ACE — Acordo de Complementação Econômica (Economic Complementation Agreement, ALADI/Mercosur)
ANDE — Administración Nacional de Electricidad (Paraguay)
BACN — Biblioteca y Archivo Central del Congreso Nacional (Library and Central Archive of the National Congress, Paraguay)
BCB — Banco Central do Brasil (Central Bank of Brazil)
BCP — Banco Central del Paraguay (Central Bank of Paraguay)
BPO — Business Process Outsourcing
CBE — Capitais Brasileiros no Exterior (Brazilian Capital Abroad, Banco Central do Brasil)
CBS — Contribuição sobre Bens e Serviços (Contribution on Goods and Services, Brazil)
CDT / DTT — convention or treaty for the avoidance of double taxation; DTT: Double Tax Treaty
CFC — Controlled Foreign Company (rules for taxing the profits of controlled companies abroad)
CIDE — Contribuição de Intervenção no Domínio Econômico (Contribution for Intervention in the Economic Domain, Brazil)
CNIME — Consejo Nacional de las Industrias Maquiladoras de Exportación (National Council of Export Maquiladora Industries)
COFINS — Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social (Contribution for the Financing of Social Security, Brazil)
DEMPE — Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection and Exploitation (relevant functions for intangibles — OECD)
DGPEJBF — Dirección General de Personas y Estructuras Jurídicas y de Beneficiarios Finales (Directorate-General of Legal Persons and Structures and Beneficial Owners, Paraguay)
DGRP — Dirección General de los Registros Públicos (Directorate-General of Public Registries, Paraguay; functions brought together in the RUN by Ley 7.424/2025)
DNIT — Dirección Nacional de Ingresos Tributarios (Paraguay)
EAS — Empresa por Acciones Simplificadas (Simplified Stock Company, Paraguay)
EP — Permanent Establishment
IBS — Imposto sobre Bens e Serviços (Tax on Goods and Services, Brazil)
ICMS — Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços (Tax on the Circulation of Goods and Services, Brazil)
IDU — Impuesto a los Dividendos y a las Utilidades (Paraguay)
IFRS / NIIF — International Financial Reporting Standards / Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera (Spanish)
IMMEX — Industria Manufacturera, Maquiladora y de Servicios de Exportación (Mexico)
INR — Impuesto a la Renta de No Residentes (Paraguay)
INTN — Instituto Nacional de Tecnología, Normalización y Metrología (Paraguay)
IPC — Consumer Price Index; in the Paraguayan context, the BCP's Índice de Precios al Consumidor
IPCA — Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo (Broad National Consumer Price Index, IBGE, Brazil)
IPI — Imposto sobre Produtos Industrializados (Tax on Industrialized Products, Brazil)
IPS — Instituto de Previsión Social (Paraguay)
IRAE — Impuesto a las Rentas de las Actividades Económicas (Uruguay)
IRE — Impuesto a la Renta Empresarial (Paraguay)
IRRF — Imposto de Renda Retido na Fonte (Withholding Income Tax, Brazil)
IS — Imposto Seletivo (Selective Tax, Brazil)
ISS — Imposto sobre Serviços de Qualquer Natureza (Tax on Services of Any Kind, Brazil)
IVA — Impuesto al Valor Agregado (Paraguay)
M3 — designation of a monetary aggregate; see the Glossary in Appendix C
MAAC — Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters
MEF — Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas (Paraguay)
Mercosur — Southern Common Market
MIC — Ministerio de Industria y Comercio (Paraguay)
MTESS — Ministerio de Trabajo, Empleo y Seguridad Social (Paraguay)
NCM — Nomenclatura Comum do Mercosul (Mercosur Common Nomenclature)
OECD — Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PIS — Programa de Integração Social (Social Integration Program, Brazil)
RECOF — Regime Aduaneiro de Entreposto Industrial sob Controle Informatizado (customs regime of industrial warehousing under computerized control, Brazil)
RUC — Registro Único de Contribuyentes (Paraguay)
RUN — Registro Unificado Nacional (Paraguay; Ley 7.424/2025 — brought together the functions of the former DGRP)
SA — Sociedad Anónima (corporation, Paraguay)
SaaS — Software as a Service (software as a service)
SE-CNIME — Executive Secretariat of CNIME
Selic — Sistema Especial de Liquidação e de Custódia (Special System for Settlement and Custody, Brazil); the system is to be distinguished from the Selic rate
SET — Subsecretaría de Estado de Tributación (Paraguay; functions integrated into DNIT)
SIMEX — Sistema Integrado de Maquila para la Exportación (Paraguay) — name used by the MIC; Art. 11 of Decree 5714/2026 calls it "Sistema Informático de Maquila"
SINAFOCAL — Sistema Nacional de Formación y Capacitación Laboral (Paraguay)
SNPP — Servicio Nacional de Promoción Profesional (Paraguay)
SRL — Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada (limited liability company, Paraguay)
TEC — Common External Tariff (Tarifa Externa Comum, Mercosur)
TPM — Tasa de Política Monetaria (monetary policy rate, Paraguay)
VAN — Valor Agregado Nacional (national value added — one of the two possible bases of the maquila Single Tax; the greater of VAN and the invoice applies; Paraguay; see Chapter 33)
VUE — Ventanilla Única del Exportador (Paraguay)
INTRODUCTION
We are living through one of the deepest transformations of the world economy since the consolidation of globalization. Companies of all sizes now compete in markets beyond their national borders, production chains have become more distributed and interdependent, services are provided and exported digitally, and tax decisions have ceased to be mere accounting matters and have taken a central role in the strategy, competitiveness and sustainability of businesses.
In this new environment, producing, providing services, hiring, investing and organizing international operations requires an integrated view. Comparing rates or apparent costs is not enough. It is necessary to understand logistics, legislation, taxation, corporate structure, labor relations, customs controls, transfer pricing, governance, technology, regulatory risks and operational capacity. Internationalization is no longer an alternative restricted to large corporations; it has become part of the planning of mid-sized companies and even of specialized businesses seeking efficiency, scale and access to new markets.
In this context, Paraguay has consolidated the Maquila Regime as one of the most relevant instruments for attracting investment, industrializing and promoting exports in South America. Over the last decades, companies in many sectors have used this model to join international production chains, add value locally, expand exports, reduce operating costs and increase their competitiveness.
Proximity to Brazil, the integration provided by Mercosur, the availability of energy, the strategic location, access to the Atlantic Ocean through the Paraguay–Paraná Waterway and the evolution of the institutional environment have all increased business interest in the country. However, those factors alone do not guarantee the viability of a project. Each operation needs to be evaluated according to its structure, its sector, its markets, its contracts, its logistics and its long-term objectives.
At the same time, the modernization of Paraguayan legislation and the implementation of the Brazilian Tax Reform open a new stage for business owners who want to structure international operations in a safe, efficient and sustainable way. Changes in the rules on consumption taxation, on the export of goods and services and on the organization of relations between companies of the same group make it indispensable to have an analysis that simultaneously considers the legal, tax and operational effects in both countries.
Understanding the maquila, therefore, takes much more than knowing a law or repeating that the regime is subject to differentiated taxation. It is necessary to understand its economic logic, its objectives, its limits, the substance requirements, the international contract, the program approved by the Paraguayan authorities, the control mechanisms, the obligations of the maquiladora company, the tax impacts in Brazil and in Paraguay and the risks arising from structures conceived without proper planning.
It is also necessary to distinguish a legitimate business operation from superficial models based solely on the pursuit of tax reduction. The maquila must not be treated as an automatic formula or as a universal solution. It is an instrument of productive integration and internationalization that can produce relevant results when there is real economic activity, planning, governance, control, compliance and consistency between what was approved and what is actually carried out.
It was to fill that gap that Maquila Demystified was born. This work was conceived to turn a subject often presented in a fragmented way into a complete, integrated, decision-oriented guide. Its purpose is not to convince the reader to set up an operation in Paraguay, but to offer knowledge, criteria and tools so that the reader can evaluate that possibility with rigor, independence and strategic vision.
In the following chapters, the reader will go through the historical evolution of the regime, its normative basis, the tax incentives, the administrative procedures, the institutional structure, the industrial maquila, maquila services, digital exports, customs controls, governance, compliance, corporate and contractual relations, the impacts of the Brazilian Tax Reform, the most common risks and the best practices for implementing internationalization projects.
The work also connects legal, tax, economic and operational aspects that are often analyzed separately, even though they are part of the same business decision. More than explaining rules, this book seeks to offer a strategic view capable of relating legislation, business, regional integration and international competitiveness.
By the end of the reading, the aim is for business owners, executives, lawyers, accountants, consultants and other professionals to be better prepared to distinguish real opportunities from simplified promises, ask the right questions, identify risks, evaluate alternatives and make well-founded decisions.
If the reader completes this journey with greater confidence, a critical spirit and a long-term view for evaluating international projects, Maquila Demystified will have fully accomplished its mission.
PART VI — TAXATION (continued: Chapters 39–40)
Part VI begins in Volume 2 — Operating in Paraguay, with Chapters 33 to 38 (Single Tax, VAT, IRE, IDU, INR and international taxation), and continues here with the tax treatment in Brazil (Chapters 39, 39-A, 39-B and 39-C) and transfer pricing (Chapter 40). The numbering is that of the complete work.
CHAPTER 39 — TAX TREATMENT IN BRAZIL
Reading note. This chapter consolidates two complementary treatments of the same subject (§39.1), deliberately preserved because they serve different readings: the legal framework is gathered in a single table, and the in-depth treatments live in the satellite chapters 39-A, 39-B and 39-C, indicated in the route map below.
Route map — how to use this chapter
This chapter has grown to cover, end to end, the Brazilian tax treatment of the Brazil–Paraguay structure — from the shareholder who lives in Brazil to the one who has already moved, from the sale that returns to the country to the one that goes on to the world. Being dense, it does not need to be read from beginning to end: each reader has a different question, and the map below points to which section answers yours. Read first the line that describes your situation; the internal cross-references lead to the rest without repetition. If you are not a tax resident in Brazil, this chapter is the worked case, not yours: take the five questions of the page "If you are not Brazilian, read it this way" to your own jurisdiction — the method is the same; the answers are not.
If your question is… |
Go to |
|---|---|
I am a Brazilian individual, shareholder of the maquiladora — how am I taxed? |
§39.1 (Lei 14.754/2023, 15% annual) and §39.1 (credit for the tax paid in Paraguay) |
My controlling company is a Brazilian legal entity (holding) — does anything change? |
§39.1 (Lei 12.973/2014, 34%) — and the warning that the income advantage almost disappears |
Does maquila count as a privileged tax regime in Brazil? |
§39.3 (the art. 24-A test; exhaustive lists; maquila not listed) — Chapter 39-A |
How much does it cost to pay the maquila from Brazil? |
§39.2 (the IRRF [Brazilian income tax withheld at source by the payer on salaries, services and payments abroad, reported to the Receita Federal; rough U.S. parallel: wage withholding (IRC § 3402) and NRA withholding (IRC §§ 1441–1443)]/CIDE [Brazilian federal contribution of 10% on payments abroad for technology licensing, technical services and related know-how; no direct U.S. equivalent]/PIS-COFINS-Imp basket) and §39.4 (model fee × product) — Chapter 39-A |
How to structure within the law — and what does not work? |
§39.5 (individual×legal entity, holding in a third country, substance, what is simulation) — Chapter 39-A |
I want to leave Brazil as an individual — what protects me? |
§39.6 (the procedure of IN 208/2002; the CARF [Brazilian federal administrative tax court, a joint body of government and taxpayer representatives, hearing appeals against first-instance tax rulings; rough U.S. parallel: IRS Appeals and the U.S. Tax Court] case 2201-011.434; a paper exit condemns) — Chapter 39-B |
I am going to export — to Brazil or to the world? goods or services? |
§39.7 (the three legs, the four scenarios, logistics, maquila services) — Chapter 39-B |
I am no longer resident in Brazil — do I still want maquila? |
§39.8 (maquila × ordinary S.A.; the Paraguayan tax authority; the new adversary) — Chapter 39-B |
Is it worth closing the company in Brazil and operating only from Paraguay? |
Module 14 (Toolkit) — the three decisions and the four configurations; Appendix E, §E.5.0 — the discussion segment by segment |
How does the Tax Reform (IBS [Brazilian subnational value-added tax on goods and services, shared by states and municipalities, created by the 2023 consumption-tax reform; no direct U.S. equivalent]/CBS) [Brazilian federal value-added tax on goods and services, created by the 2023 consumption-tax reform to replace PIS and Cofins; no direct U.S. equivalent] affect all this? |
integrated in the body: §39.1 (in this chapter), §39.7.6 and §39.8.6 (Chapter 39-B) |
Dividends, foreign exchange and ancillary obligations? |
Chapter 15 §15.D (obligations), §39.1 (remittance of dividends) and Chapter 15 §15.E (foreign exchange and accounts) Chapter 39 has a single section of its own — §39.1, the legal framework —, and it is the one that answers five of the lines in the map above: the income layers, the credit for the Paraguayan tax, the frame of the Reform, the ancillary obligations and the final calculation for the two vehicles. Within §39.1, orient yourself by the highlighted openings of each paragraph — “How the layers fit together”, “The credit for the Paraguayan tax”, “The consumption Reform”, “Who declares what, under the regime in force” and “The final calculation” —, which correspond, in that order, to the lines of the map. Timeline: 2026 is the test year; 2027–2028 and 2029–2032 are distinct phases; the full system begins in 2033. |
39.1 Brazilian legal framework applicable to maquila
The tax, accounting and compliance treatment of the Brazil–Paraguay structure revolves around an articulated set of rules — the main regulatory pillars:
Rule |
Core content |
Application to BR–PY maquila |
|---|---|---|
Lei 14.754/2023 |
Taxation of profits of subsidiaries abroad – individuals |
Brazilian individual shareholder of the maquiladora |
IN RFB [sub-statutory regulation issued by the Receita Federal, a complementary norm of tax law under art. 100 of the National Tax Code; rough U.S. parallel: Treasury Regulations and IRS Revenue Procedures] 2.180/20241 |
Regulates Lei 14.754/2023 |
Regulation of the taxation of income and assets abroad of individuals; filing obligations must be checked in the DAA guidance for the tax year. |
Lei 12.973/20142 |
Worldwide taxation – legal entities |
Brazilian corporate controlling company of the maquiladora |
MP 2.158-35/2001, art. 74 (repealed) |
CFC [Brazilian rules taxing a resident owner on profits of foreign controlled companies: Law 12.973/2014 for corporations, Law 14.754/2023 for individuals; rough U.S. parallel: Subpart F / net CFC tested income rules (IRC §§ 951–951A)] rule for legal entities until 2014 |
Historical: repealed by Lei 12.973/2014 (art. 117, IX), with effect from 1/01/2015; the profits of subsidiaries abroad follow Lei 12.973 (arts. 76 to 92) |
Lei 14.596/2023 |
OECD-aligned transfer pricing |
Intercompany transactions Brazil–maquiladora |
Lei 9.430/1996, arts. 24 and 24‑A3 |
Low-tax countries and privileged tax regimes |
Defines whether the maquila regime can be seen as “privileged” |
IN RFB 1.037/2010 (updated by IN RFB 2.265/2025)4 |
List of low-tax countries and privileged regimes |
Paraguay and the maquila regime are not on the exhaustive lists of IN RFB 1.037/2010; annual taxation of the individual may still arise from active income of its own below 60% of total income, depending on the facts (see §39.3, Chapter 39-A). |
EC 132/2023 [Brazilian constitutional amendment that reformed consumption taxation, authorizing the IBS, the CBS and the Selective Tax [Brazilian federal excise created by the tax reform on goods and services harmful to health or the environment; rough U.S. parallel: federal excise taxes]; rough U.S. parallel: a tax authorized by constitutional amendment, like the Sixteenth Amendment (formal parallel only)] |
Tax Reform – IBS/CBS, immunity of exports |
Constitutional basis of non-incidence on exports |
LC 214/2025 [Brazilian complementary law that institutes the IBS, the CBS and the Selective Tax, detailing the consumption-tax reform; rough U.S. parallel: the Internal Revenue Code, as the statute instituting federal taxes (formal parallel only)] |
IBS/CBS – rules on incidence, credits and immunities |
Exports of goods/services by Brazilian companies linked to maquila. Time reading: 2026 is the test year; 2027–2028 and 2029–2032 are distinct phases; the full system begins in 2033. |
The combined reading of these statutes is what, in practice, defines when and how the maquiladora's profits will be taxed in Brazil, the room for tax credit, the impact of the consumption Reform and the limits of legitimate planning.
How the layers fit together, in one pass. The first question is always who the shareholder is: a resident individual falls under Lei 14.754/2023 — 15% IRPF [Brazilian federal personal income tax with progressive monthly brackets up to 27.5%, plus a reduction mechanism for lower incomes; rough U.S. parallel: the federal individual income tax (Form 1040)] on the maquiladora's profit computed on December 31, on an accrual basis, regardless of distribution, when the subsidiary is in a listed jurisdiction/regime or has active income below 60% (maquila is not in the exhaustive lists of IN RFB 1.037/2010 — §39.3 —, and what remains is the active-income test); a legal entity falls under Lei 12.973/2014 — addition of the subsidiary's profit to taxable profit, IRPJ [Brazilian federal corporate income tax, 15% plus a 10% surcharge on profit above a monthly threshold, computed under real, presumed or arbitrated profit; rough U.S. parallel: the federal corporate income tax (IRC § 11)]+CSLL [Brazilian federal social contribution levied on corporate net profit, alongside corporate income tax, to finance social security; no direct U.S. equivalent] of ~34%, with MP 2.158-35/2001 already repealed on that point (art. 74, repealed by Lei 12.973/2014, art. 117, IX, since 2015) and the profit computed on December 31 (art. 77). The second question is the price: every transaction with the maquiladora is a controlled one (Lei 14.596/2023) and answers to arm’s length on both sides of the border (Chapter 40). The third is the list: being or not in a low-tax jurisdiction (Lei 9.430/1996, art. 24) or under a privileged tax regime (art. 24-A) — the two lists of IN 1037/2010 — changes thin capitalization and deductibility (Lei 12.249/2010, arts. 25 and 26) and reaches transfer pricing; in the IRRF, the increase by the beneficiary's location (art. 8 of Lei 9.779/1999) depends only on the low-tax jurisdiction, because the article refers to art. 24 and not to art. 24-A — a privileged tax regime, on its own, does not increase the withholding —, and it is not to be confused with the 25% that art. 7 of the same law sets as the general rule for services, with or without a list (§39.2.1). It is the hinge between the layers. The operational details of each layer live in the satellites: paying the maquila (Chapter 39-A), leaving Brazil (Chapter 39-B) and the shareholder's residence (Chapter 39-C).
The credit for the Paraguayan tax requires separating individuals and legal entities. For the individual with the profit of a subsidiary taxed under art. 5 of Lei 14.754/2023, §15 allows deducting the income tax due and paid by the subsidiary, within the legal requirements and limits, without requiring reciprocity. For the controlling legal entity, the rules of Lei 12.973/2014 apply. In both cases, the work does not conclude that the 1% Single Tax is creditable: its alternative gross base requires verifying whether it qualifies as an income tax and whether it falls on the profit or earnings computed in Brazil. §38.8 develops the pending point and keeps the conservative mode at zero credit until an official ruling or a specific analysis of the tax.
The presumed credit is something else. Until calendar year 2029, the controlling company "poderá deduzir até 9% (nove por cento), a título de crédito presumido, sobre a renda incidentes [sic] sobre a parcela positiva computada no lucro real" (may deduct up to 9%, as a presumed credit, on the income tax levied on the positive portion computed in taxable profit — explanatory translation), when the investee abroad manufactures beverages or food products, builds buildings or infrastructure works, or carries on the "demais indústrias em geral" (other industries in general) (Lei 12.973/2014, art. 87, §10, as worded by Lei 15.079/2024). The text refers to the conditions of items I and IV of art. 91; item I was repealed by the same Lei 15.079/2024, and what remains is own active income equal to or above 80% of total income (art. 91, IV), to be proven. Whether maquila fits within the "other industries in general" depends on the actual activity, the substance and the documents of the operation — not on the activity code. LC 224/2025, which limits the use of presumed credits to 90% of the original amount (art. 4, §4, IV), reaches the benefits in the tax expenditure statement and the regimes it lists (art. 4, §2); the §10 credit is not among the listed regimes, and this work did not locate it in the statement — the limit does not apply by presumption, but the check accompanies each fiscal year. That is why this work does not project that credit: without demonstrated eligibility, the calculation is made without it; with eligibility, it enters as a separate sensitivity, with the percentage actually applicable — never with an automatic 9% or 8.1%.
The consumption Reform does not directly change CFC, IRRF or the income tax credit regime; it redesigns the transactional and customs end. In 2026, the test year, the previous taxes remain applicable and IBS/CBS follow the obligations and waiver cases in force. In 2027–2028, CBS replaces PIS/Cofins [Brazilian federal social contributions computed on a company's gross revenue, to be replaced by the CBS under the tax reform; no direct U.S. equivalent] and IBS remains in its initial phase; from 2029 to 2032, IBS gradually replaces ICMS [Brazilian state-level tax on the circulation of goods and on interstate and intermunicipal transport and communication services; rough U.S. parallel: state and local sales taxes] and ISS [Brazilian municipal tax on services of any nature, levied by municipalities and the Federal District under a federal complementary law; rough U.S. parallel: state and local sales taxes on services]; in 2033 the full system operates. Imports and exports must be examined according to the legal requirements, the taxpayer's regime, the characterization of the operation and the effective use of credits. The effects on the payment to the maquila are in §39.4 and the effects on exporting or selling to Brazil, in §§39.7.6 and 39.8.6.
Who declares what, under the regime in force. The individual shareholder declares the subsidiary in the DIRPF (according to the applicable regime of Lei 14.754/2023 and the guidance for the year's return) and, when assets abroad reach the threshold in force (US$ 1 million), files the CBE [mandatory declaration to the Central Bank of assets held abroad by Brazilian residents above US$ 1 million (annual) or US$ 100 million (quarterly); rough U.S. parallel: the FBAR and TIC reports, in part] with the Banco Central — an annual obligation, with quarterly windows for higher levels; the legal entity reflects the subsidiary in the ECF [Brazilian federal ancillary filings: the DCTF declares federal tax debits and credits; the ECF is the digital accounting-tax bookkeeping supporting IRPJ/CSLL computation; rough U.S. parallel: Forms 941 and 1120] (Lei 12.973/2014) and likewise in the CBE when it qualifies. The former obligations to register services (SISCOSERV, abolished in 2020) and export proceeds (DEREX, abolished in 2018 — since 2019 the information follows art. 4 of IN RFB 1.801/2018 and Block V of the ECF Manual) remain in the table above only as a historical note — the reader should not look for them: the current trail of cross-border operations is the combination DIRPF/ECF + CBE + current customs and foreign-exchange modules. The typical operational error is the reverse of the bureaucratic one: forgetting the CBE (BCB [Brazilian central bank, which issues currency, conducts monetary policy, controls credit and supervises financial institutions; rough U.S. parallel: the Federal Reserve System] fines) while looking for a SISCOSERV that no longer exists.
The final calculation must distinguish individuals and legal entities, the moment of taxation and the legally admitted credits. One unit of credit is not deducted from profit merely because the nominal rate of the Single Tax is 1%: its base is not necessarily profit, and its creditability is not confirmed (§38.8). The comparison between vehicles requires the cases of Lei 14.754/2023 and the regime of Lei 12.973/2014, as per §39.1; the incidences on consumption must be computed separately (§39.4).
General Regime (subsidiaries falling under Art. 5, §5):
Tax: IRPF
Rate: 15% (uniform, without deductions from the base)
Timing: 31 December of each year (accrual basis)
Base: Profits computed in the subsidiary's balance sheet, in proportion to the individual's shareholding
Return: DAA (Annual Adjustment Return) — new financial income schedule
Balance sheet: IFRS or BR GAAP (if in a low-tax jurisdiction/privileged regime: BR GAAP mandatory)
Conversion: Banco Central closing rate (selling) for the last business day of December5
Regime for subsidiaries outside §5 (not classified):
Taxation at the moment of actual availability (cash basis)
Applies to profits computed from 1 January 2024
Credit for the Tax Paid in Paraguay
The rule of art. 5, §15, of Lei 14.754/2023 does not demonstrate, on its own, that the Single Tax is creditable. There is no confirmed credit amount in this example; the specific analysis is in §38.8.
The Maquila Regime as a "Privileged Tax Regime" (Art. 24-A, Lei 9.430/1996)?
This was the legally most debated question of the chapter, and the official answer exists: the lists of IN RFB 1.037/2010 are exhaustive and have prospective effects, and maquila is not in the list of privileged tax regimes (RFB guidance on Lei 14.754/2023; §39.3). The criteria below explain why the topic was debated — they are not a classification in force; the change, if it comes, will come by inclusion in the IN, with forward-looking effects.
Art. 24-A of Lei 9.430/1996 defines a privileged tax regime as one that presents at least one of the following characteristics:
I — does not tax income or does so at a maximum rate below 17%;
The Paraguayan IRE is 10% — therefore below 17%
The 1% Single Tax is clearly below 17%
The complete analysis of the art. 24-A criteria — including criterion II (tax advantage to a non-resident without a requirement of substantial economic activity) and the practical effect of the absence of listing — has its home in §39.3 (Chapter 39-A) and is not repeated here: nominal layer outside the lists of IN 1037/2010; regulatory layer: the lists are exhaustive, and the 17% test does not, by itself, classify an unlisted regime.
General Regime (Lei 12.973/2014, for legal entities):
| Item | Rule |
|---|---|
| Taxation | Worldwide basis — subsidiary's profits added to the controlling company's taxable profit |
| IRPJ | 15% + 10% surcharge on the portion > R$20,000/month |
| CSLL | 9% |
| Combined nominal rate | 34% (15% + 10% surcharge on what exceeds R$ 20 thousand per month + 9% CSLL), before the credit for tax paid abroad (art. 87) |
| Timing | On the subsidiary's balance sheet, at December 31 (accrual basis), under Lei 12.973/2014, art. 77 |
| Credit | Allows offset of the tax paid abroad up to the limit of the Brazilian IRPJ/CSLL |
Keep supporting documentation of the tax paid abroad
| Obligation | Basis | Who files |
|---|---|---|
| Stage | Taxation in Paraguay | Taxation in Brazil |
| DAA (Annual Adjustment Return) — new schedule | Lei 14.754/2023 + IN RFB 2180/2024 | Controlling individual |
| ECF (Escrituração Contábil Fiscal) | IN RFB 1422/2013 | Controlling legal entity |
| SISCOSERV (abolished in 2020) | Portaria Conjunta [Joint Ordinance] SECINT/RFB nº 25/2020 (definitive deactivation) | Historical note: the registration of services/intangibles was abolished in 2020, with no direct substitute — abolition checked in the official act |
| CBE (Declaration of Brazilian Capital Abroad) | BCB — CBE (Resolução BCB 279/2022, arts. 10 and 11); threshold US$ 1 million | Individuals/legal entities with assets abroad above the threshold in force (§38.7) |
| DEREX | RFB — abolished in 2018 (IN RFB 1.801/2018, art. 4) | Historical note: an RFB obligation on export proceeds kept abroad, abolished in 2018 — from 2019 the information is provided in the form of art. 4 of IN RFB 1.801/2018, and the ECF Manual keeps Block V — DEREX (official RFB page, checked on 31/08/2026). The CBE, of the BCB, is a distinct obligation and does not replace it |
| Distribution of maquila profits | EXEMPT (Art. 38 Ley 7547) | IRPF 15% (individual) or 34% IRPJ+CSLL (legal entity) |
| IOF on the remittance | Not applicable (not a PY tax) | IOF/Foreign exchange on inflow: 0.38% in the residual hypothesis (art. 15-B, XXV, Decree 6.306/2007); check the specific classification and validity (§45-E.7). |
| Brazilian IRRF on dividends | N/A (comes from abroad) | Dividends received by a legal entity: there is no new taxable event on receipt — the subsidiary's profit has already been taxed on an accrual basis in the balance sheet, under the system for subsidiaries abroad (§39.1, Lei 12.973/2014). Not to be confused with Lei 15.270/2025, which reaches the remittance from Brazil abroad, and not the dividend coming from Paraguay to Brazil. Time reading: 2026 is the test year; 2027–2028 and 2029–2032 are distinct phases; the full system begins in 2033. |
Governance of transfer pricing, foreign exchange and compliance.
End of the sample. The book continues in the following chapters.
